Agreed, Like people saying Norway, Denmark, Iceland etc. should be a TT just no… Make them part of sweden you dont have to do that!
Besides sweden already has a Norwegian tank.
Agreed, Like people saying Norway, Denmark, Iceland etc. should be a TT just no… Make them part of sweden you dont have to do that!
Besides sweden already has a Norwegian tank.
Ditto for the notion of subtrees. Otherwise there aren’t enough vehicles to fill the roster and we are back to copy-paste vehicles that the community love so much.
How many of those TTs would include at least one of the following:
Im sure theres couple vehicles I missed, but cmon.
Inb4 “this variant is totally unique tho because it has extra 5mm plate”.
Latam/Iberian tree
Spanish/Mexican F5
Spanish Mirage F1
Chilean/portuguese F16
Spanish Harrier
Spanish F18
Spanish Eurofighter
Brazilian Gripen
Venezuelan Su30
Cuban mig29
iceland lol
“it has a extra 5mm plate and unique livery”
Understandable, lets pump out 6 of those TTs by next friday.
Most of those would work as sub trees, but North/South Korea will probably work the best as their own tech tree.
Yes, 99% of their vehicles are bought from countries we already have in game.
And which nations can be added with the least amount of copy paste?
All the popular suggestions for a new tree tends to be a lot of C&P
Or just add the spanish AV-8 and F1 to Italy and leave it alone
But this belgian greyhound has extra 20mm plate on top of the turret, ergo it is not copy paste
Forgot T-54 which we could add one to every in game nation without japan
Polish tree with czech sub tt would be good too
Seriously this is a suggestion
If you want top tier consisting of single F-16 just play Japan. No need to add new tech trees :D
New tech tree “everything else” every nation not currently ingame
Oh no!
Anyway-
If any given proposed tree cant be made without major gaps in lineups, capabilities or being mostly copypaste it shouldnt be added as standalone tt, simple as.
🤢yuck