If Britain were to get another sub-tree (which they don’t and never needed) I’d much rather they went the Australian or Canadian route.
India’s military character has been of a neutral state with weapons from both the eastern and western blocs while Britain is a fully western character itself.
India has enough domestic vehicles and unique modifications to warrant an Israeli-styled tree anyways.
Yeah…maybe look up their history first as to why this might not be the best idea
Surely you realize the implication of this statement can go a million routes…?
Let’s add some meaning to it
I’d much prefer they went the Australian route and were sprinkled in here and there where needed. They barely have enough unique vehicles to make another Israeli tree. Which by the way don’t want, did it before and hated it worst experience grinding by far.
My response is to the OP. Pakistan under India tree, not the best idea.
Yeah that makes sense.
I do wonder what other country would make the most sense as an Indian sub-tree considering that Bangladesh and Pakistan aren’t such good options.
Personally I can’t really think of any others, but surely there is at least something.
Well the player base doesn’t like the Israeli tt styled tree. I dont think anyone would like to have another Israeli styled TT.
I’ve heard many voices on both sides of the equation. Personally I think it’s a good option for nations such as Turkey, the Koreas and, of course, India.
Sri lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Afghanistan
I’m not sure any of those would provide much except possibly Afghanistan with their strange modifications or Sri Lanka that has practically nothing unique.
Not sure about the relations or military cooperations, but perhaps the two named could work?
Most of India’s weapons are foreign trade products. Even if there are some modifications, there are too few original contents. As for Australia, there are even fewer. The advantage of taking India as a British subtree is that there is no need to worry about the defects of systematization. You can omit the copied and pasted content, and only need to introduce original content, such as Arjun of a whole subtree
India’s original content is not even half as rich as that of South Korea and North Korea，If you regard it as an independent tree, more than 60% of the vehicles are meaningless
While I would broadly agree that the Koreas are a better option, I think that Indian potential in the game is often overlooked.
They had some pretty fun prototypes that could very well function in the game and have better helicopter and aviation content than the Koreas.
I already stated why I don’t like the Indian sub-tree concept, so I won’t be restating that.
I think India is a better concept than most people give is credit for, as it is one of those countries whose products can be more difficult to research, but I do get the notion of seeing better options in other countries.
I for one believe that Yugoslavia absolutely trumps the Indian concept and that there are several other countries that would be better too, but India would be fine as well and I wouldn’t get upset over it.
There are some unique Sri lankan vehicles such as the Type 62 with scorpion turret though those handful of vehicles wouldn’t be enough to make a subtree.
It’s sold to many other nations. Pakistan never bought the MBT2000 instead they locally manufactured it and their variant isn’t same as the MBT-2000
how many versions are there of the al khalid?
One official variant and a few prototype variants. Al Khalid 2’s development was cancelled recently.
what would the al khalid 2 have over the other variants?
Idk
Wait you think adding India with a subtree of a country that hates them is a good idea, that’s like saying Russia should get a subtree for Ukraine