Brother we have quite some good history with russia and ussr
They have helped us build rockets by building our parts for us
They launched our sattelites from their rockets
We have factories established with the help of ussr
We are not just their customers
They have helped us catch up to the current world after our independence
1 Like
yeah thats the point of it
getting bought off the USA did and still does it USSR was like that with the afghans too and look what happened when they started poking around elsewhere
wish it all wasnt dishonest in nature though cuz it could do some real good if it was purely about trade
What is your point here
nothin just an observation
Could you hand me a screenshot of said statement?
It’s a good thing to have in the back pocket :)
2 Likes
All Indian vehicles would be copy-paste or have negligible difference from their native Russian, French, and British counterparts, except for a very small handful
The “nation tree” system is totally broken for modern aircraft and tanks - it mostly works up until the early cold war, but then it just slowly disintegrates … which happens faster and faster the closer you get to top tier!
1 Like
I’m tired of US getting all of their export models added to their tech tree. Like for example the Australian Abrams and F111. America doesn’t need more of the same vehicles and already is good enough.
copy/paste
Then just don’t play it, no one is forcing you to play it.
- Australian Abrams was good sqv for being different from other Abrams, so it’s fairly unique while also still being of American origin
- The F-111C is in the UK tree, though it is also fairly unique and of American origin
Why play any other nation than this then? They would just get every single top tier jet currently in game. Would screw over people who grinded any other nation’s top tier air. Nah, don’t add this.
Following this logic Israel air is purely copypaste. The only thing that makes them actually unique is their weaponry, and it’s basically the same for India (except they, unlike Israel, have some fully indigenous aircraft)
India should be within Israel’s tree for simplicity since they cooperate militarily. Israel was also a major backer of India during the 1971 and 1999 Indo-Pakistan war. Israel is India’s second largest supplier of Military hardware, second to only Russia.
India Israel Relations - History, Challenges, Bilateral Relations
1 Like
Israel tree feels like orbital void right now so it seems to me like a really good solution, especially since I don’t like the idea of putting indian tech in uk tt
3 lines for Israel and 2 for India seems right
I agree. The UK and India aren’t particularly close, unlike Israel and India. Even since the 1950s, Israel and India have been fairly close.
Israel has extensively supported many nations and can grow immensely if Gaijin will allow it. From India in Asia to Chile in South America, Israel can have many minor nations.
1 Like
India is probably enough, there’s a pretty big amount of planes for air… Just at top tier they can have a Rafale, a mig-29, a su30mki, a Tejas and a Bison
IDK if ive seen this thread before but India is not a good fit for the British tree. the two countries arent particularly close anymore and indian vehicles couldn’t be much further away from the typical British vehicle doctrine.
2 Likes
There is, but there could be more for ground. Israel has a habit of helping nations under threat of invasion such as Chile and India.
I don’t tend to focus much on aircraft when it comes to these things. My mindset usually sits in the ground tree.
Chilean air force would be 100% pure US copypaste, so we can put Chilean vehicles in the ground tree and keep air tree for India
a ground-only subtree sounds like the best to me