CV90 family is copy paste? Or STRV-103 family?
Way too big of a generalization
2 Likes
Wrong.
“Grizzly Firefly” is the name of the tank. Which is a tank built by Canada Hull and all. Its only ties to the US were the original blueprints it was based on.
Mytho here was close they just forgot to name the tank.
2 Likes
Knowing you i already knew who made it
2 Likes
Indeed I was mostly asking them. I do have a pic of an Aussie vehicle tho.
1 Like
For that should I play yet more centurions and sorts? No. I can live without the CV90.
This is to some extent the raison d’etre for the israeli tree: “suffer the copy-pastes for the Merkavas”
Ofc to a much lesser extent since sweden has unique early tanks, unique aesthetic.
Even so, I would’ve been just as happy with those unique vehicles if they were in the german tree or something.
Lol, sure, it doesn’t look like yet another M4 at all
Ah, here is the point I was getting at and one of Mahiwews
Just because it looks like an M4 doesn’t mean it is an M4.
Looks alone don’t make it a C&P vehicle.
2 Likes
is the R3 air to air missile a sidewinder
no but they are very similar
Considering what this person considers to be “minor modifications” it hardly matters anyways lol.
According to his previously stated logic Sweden is copy paste yet he now claims it has a unique aesthetic and is unique in low-mid tier.
It’s just a case of cherrypicking as you stated earlier and it’s honestly surprising that we are choosing to continue this conversation against such contradictory points.
1 Like
me look at the rank 1 Vickers they have
Yes very Swedish
not every nation makes everything they use in house
I’d also add nor do they use everything they make.
3 Likes
It has unique aesthetic until rank 3. It’s simple.
Yes, they do.
Finish copy-paste subtree, not really swedish. New “addition”.
You can argue czech suspension for swedish.
The aesthetic is pre war tanks mate like of course how they look is going to change as they get better tanks
2 Likes
No they don’t
2 Likes
Did you ever hear of the phrase;“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” Its a statement that for what we find ugly or beautiful is in the end subjective to each person. If looks alone make any given tank Copy and paste to you so be it. But don’t go around pretending your subjective view is technical or even factual.
2 Likes
Czech suspension?? No brother, Czechoslovak entire hull! You’re contradicting yourself still…
Me noticing it and pointing it out. Also those few TDs don’t give the early swedish unique flavour. The regular tanks do, that apart from m/41 look nothing like anything else we have in game.
That’s the opposite of contradiction, bro. Coupled with the above statement that even swedish vehicles I would have been more than fine if they were in the german tree.
Surprise, surprise, where the other czech things are.
It’s a stupid phrase that has little basis in reality. It’s a fact that humans have similar tastes and there is a simpler way to prove this: “distaste of shit”. Phrase only holds some water because higher we go on the beauty/taste scale, harder is to explain or even distinguish.
Go to sleep bro. You are making no sense. Some sleep should refresh your mind.
From your logic more than half of the vehicles in game should not exist.
3 Likes
By your logic it is by all means senseless that said Czechoslovak vehicles are in the German tree, yet you actively wish them to go there.
According to your previously stated logic the Pz.35 and -38 variants should all be removed as well as the Hetzer, as this does not have the “Czechoslovak aesthetic”.