Sweden has it’s unique aesthetic until about Strv 74 (that’s exactly where I stopped).
You know why I don’t go further? Copy-paste. Bleh, not gonna play. Sure it has some of its own atgm thingies, but not gonna bother dipping my toes into the copy-paste ranks just for those.
Not how it started. Otherwise we’d had t-34 in german tree and M4 in soviet one and so on (sherman was the single one I think and the planes were premiums). We didn’t had a copy-paste soup when we had 4 ground trees.
“Grizzly Firefly” is the name of the tank. Which is a tank built by Canada Hull and all. Its only ties to the US were the original blueprints it was based on.
Mytho here was close they just forgot to name the tank.
For that should I play yet more centurions and sorts? No. I can live without the CV90.
This is to some extent the raison d’etre for the israeli tree: “suffer the copy-pastes for the Merkavas”
Ofc to a much lesser extent since sweden has unique early tanks, unique aesthetic.
Even so, I would’ve been just as happy with those unique vehicles if they were in the german tree or something.
Considering what this person considers to be “minor modifications” it hardly matters anyways lol.
According to his previously stated logic Sweden is copy paste yet he now claims it has a unique aesthetic and is unique in low-mid tier.
It’s just a case of cherrypicking as you stated earlier and it’s honestly surprising that we are choosing to continue this conversation against such contradictory points.
Did you ever hear of the phrase;“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” Its a statement that for what we find ugly or beautiful is in the end subjective to each person. If looks alone make any given tank Copy and paste to you so be it. But don’t go around pretending your subjective view is technical or even factual.