There is no point in Foldering the Two since there arent any more planes after them. It would make sense if there where more planes after the EF and if the EF would hinder you from reaching them.
The new F/A-18E should also be foldered with the current F/A-18C Late, per the no more then 3 Vehicle in a rank rule. I know the super hornet is a significant upgrade to the regular hornet, but it is just to much to grind for…
It should be an upgrade of the current. Why are we grinding another 400k plus 2.5 mill SL in costs for the same jet, at the same br, with a different radar…
You know what i would disagree. You guys should face what we faced with f15C GE :) ( this is just a joke don’t take it seriously and i completely support it being foldered)
Tis shame I am a fool and didnt back up my replays and screenshots of WT, since I had a screen from September where difference between real enemy position and one displayed by radar is some 6km.
Not really comparable as the E and the C are fairly different. If you’ve seen the thread about the F/A-18D I would rather something like that foddered with the F/A-18C, and then F/A-18F with the E.
Additionally I am referring to the current state of the dev server, I do take into account other potential versions of the Hornet, that might or might not be added later. Currently as modeled on the dev server we have 4 rows in one rank for the F/A-18E Super Hornet. And that is in defiance of the RoadMap News from above.
They are probably going to work around it by saying its rank 8. Like how they used to work around the “no top tier premiums” rule by just putting it one rank below the final rank.
I agree but given the numerous other vehicles that didn’t get this treatment and nobody else came in mass to complain about it i doubt this will gain any traction from the snail unfortunately
well not only are those f-18s different Brs the new one gets a better loadout unlike the euro fighter which you could never tell them apart without looking at the radar in x-ray