New eurofighters should be at-least foldered

The only difference between the older and newer ones is the radar. Everything else from armaments to battle ratings remain the same.

Why do I have to grind a whole new plane just to experience a new radar smh.

There’s my vent.

  • Make the new ones foldered
  • LET ME GRINDD!!!
0 voters
11 Likes

+1
It feels bad to grind 390k RP for a better radar…
Current Eurofighter radar isn’t even that bad.

5 Likes

There is no point in Foldering the Two since there arent any more planes after them. It would make sense if there where more planes after the EF and if the EF would hinder you from reaching them.

1 Like

The new F/A-18E should also be foldered with the current F/A-18C Late, per the no more then 3 Vehicle in a rank rule. I know the super hornet is a significant upgrade to the regular hornet, but it is just to much to grind for…

4 Likes

only if f15c golden eagle was foldered with f15c

6 Likes

It should be an upgrade of the current. Why are we grinding another 400k plus 2.5 mill SL in costs for the same jet, at the same br, with a different radar…

1 Like

The F-16A and ADF were foldered, so these typhoons should be too as they represent a marginally better variant but not at the cost of 400k

4 Likes

You know what i would disagree. You guys should face what we faced with f15C GE :) ( this is just a joke don’t take it seriously and i completely support it being foldered)

4 Likes

Tis shame I am a fool and didnt back up my replays and screenshots of WT, since I had a screen from September where difference between real enemy position and one displayed by radar is some 6km.

It is that bad.

1 Like

you need less RP for foldered vehicles

1 Like

Not really comparable as the E and the C are fairly different. If you’ve seen the thread about the F/A-18D I would rather something like that foddered with the F/A-18C, and then F/A-18F with the E.

Yeah but if you would actually have read my comment, I do acknowledge that the E is significantly different from the C. The title of this post is about the EF, but I wanted to add, that this should also be considered for the new F/A-18E Super Hornet, as to the “no more then 3 Rows per Rank” rule Gaijin once posted: [Development] [RoadMap] Following the Roadmap: grouping vehicles, rank changes, and improvements to premium vehicles - News - War Thunder.

Additionally I am referring to the current state of the dev server, I do take into account other potential versions of the Hornet, that might or might not be added later. Currently as modeled on the dev server we have 4 rows in one rank for the F/A-18E Super Hornet. And that is in defiance of the RoadMap News from above.

The Type 10 and TKX(L) are both foldered despite being end of the line.

4 Likes

They are probably going to work around it by saying its rank 8. Like how they used to work around the “no top tier premiums” rule by just putting it one rank below the final rank.

f15c ge:yeah,i think so
1755221801417

1 Like

I agree but given the numerous other vehicles that didn’t get this treatment and nobody else came in mass to complain about it i doubt this will gain any traction from the snail unfortunately

These three should be in a folder
image
These three should be in a folder
image
The new F-18 should be in a folder with the other 2

1 Like

the f-15s are all different brs and the f-18 at least gets more missiles

1 Like

These 2 would like to have a word about having different brs
image
Also having 2 more missiles isnt that much of an upgrade when the F-18C has 12

well not only are those f-18s different Brs the new one gets a better loadout unlike the euro fighter which you could never tell them apart without looking at the radar in x-ray

1 Like