what on earth are you trying to say?
No i literally couldnt care less for which gamemode you play. Play what you enjoy the most. But the soyuz has also literally the exact same stats in naval arcade of 7.09:1 K/d to Iowas 4.28 and Yamato at 1.8 So its unsurprisingly just as broken there as in rb. With the gamemode just differing in aiming, torpedo reload and slight speed increase (correct me if im wrong pls) thats not surprising. But as long as people are having fun playing blatantly overpowered vehicles they will defend them till the last straw i guess. In the end, who doesnt love clapping whole lobbies effortlessly. Understandable that people that are having fun doing that have 0 interest in a better balance for the stuff at the same br. Then you would have to do something to do well. Why care about if thats really bad for the gameplay, the gamemode itself or player numbers for naval in general am i right?
Also:
Ehhhh…whut?!? ah i get it worded a bit wrong. Yeah maybe would have been completed, could have been should have…whatever it was it was cancelled very early in its construction and all its number it has in the game (of which almost all of them somehow magically are the best or amongst the best of all the other top tier ships while most of the deciding parts of the project like armor, guns etc… would have been at least very hard or impossible at that time for the ussr to build) are completely fictional wishful thinking of what it maybe would have been at a time when most other nations already started decomissioning their battleships because battleships were outdated by then ??? man if only the japanese wouldnt have been so rational and just started laying the keel for super yamato, the germans started to put some metal into a drydock and said this is going to be the H-44 in 3 years or the US test a gun in a one barrel configuration in a stationary mount and said we will definitely put that on the montana, trust.
Im completely fine with the soyuz being added into the game and more nations/people being able to play and compete at 8.3 and 8.7 dont get me wrong. But why is it necessary that it is literally almost twice as effective as the second (and basically only) competition, the iowa? Why wouldn’t it work to put it into the game in the patch in a balanced state, with all the concerns that were already voiced during the Dev server?
That’s what i said in my comment ;-)
Yeah right tell that to Scharnhorst which been unkillable for years.
Oh look you one of them, do you asked to nerf it over the years?
Here is what to do for balance, not some random nerfs cause someone offended State of the naval modes on dev server and after update comes live
Yeah like impossible to win the Great Patriotic War for sure.
But they do, maybe you just no one of them. Git gut.
By measure of 5 days with broken Yamato and Roma, yeah those numbers are right for sure.
1 Like
Does anyone have details about this design variant of Sovetsky Soyuz?
In this diagram the armour belt ends at the first main calibre turret. One of the main reason of Soyuz’s great survivability is the extended citadel forward to prevent any shell to penetrate into magazine from front angles. This variant however looks more similar to the conventional schemes of other nations.
7 Likes
Yep, but I think the main reason cause Souyz OP is her bow’s armor, some skillful players I know that they will facing her bow to enemy only use turret 1and2 to fire, of course they keep long range at the sametime. In her bow there are three layers of armor, they can perfect protection for her mag 1. If I remember correctly, 280mm+230mm+20mm armors in her bow, these armors cause her very difficultly to be sink by magazine explosion . So I suggest u can try what I say in naval AB.
Picture is here : )
Honestly that one would’ve been a lot more balanced than the one we have now
That’s right, I want mention it too.
If u really see the forum, u will know what I say.
By the way, I indeed say Soyuz need to be balanced when the Dev server was opened.
230mm cemented plate or 400mm non cemented plate with inaccurate guns and 2/3rd of the explosive filler it has now
Except there’s no point discussing it in the first place, it never happened. You can argue about “soviet engineering” all you want, reality is the ship did not exist, period.
It’s a bit too easy to say “i could achieve it for sure too !” afterwards
1 Like
Yes, i did:
I also played against it. and sometimes you need to play something yourself AND against it to see how blatantly stupid it is. And whichever vehicle is dominating any gamemode (especially if its at the highest BR, because then it doesnt need to face vehicles of even higher BRs obviously) its never good for the game. Already good players will flock to it and in no time 80% of all the other vehicles are pointless to play. Now explain to me how anyone but the people abusing these vehicles profit from it? I played the scharnhorst, yes its fun, obviously if youre close to invincible and a menace on exactly the maps sizes the snail has chosen to be the only ones in naval rb. But its also boring af and not challenging at all at one point. So i basically stopped or played it very rarely after that (mainly only in naval ec)
Well fortunately (and i mean that honestly) winning vs nazi germany didnt take the ussr have a great navy.
Yeah im sure everyone is absolutely enyojing the ship out of playing the yamato or the roma or the richelieu at the moment. But as long as u dont need to “git gud” playing the soyuz its alright.
Ok lets wait till end of the month im sure the yamato will be much better then with the same armor (and same armor, splinter armor missing, giant ammo rack with like 5 times the size of the soyuz, missing splinter armor and ammo clipping through armor will absolutely slap then) It wont. as it is rn yamato could be 8.3 or 8.0 even and the soyuz 9.3. It’s literally the worst of all ships i played grinding through two whole tech trees with all ships researched and most played and spaded. It’s an absolute shipshow, easiest ship to oneshot i have ever seen.
Did they nerfed him?
But SU did have a great navy just after the war. Second best in the world FYI.
i know nothing about their post ww2 navy, but good for them. Irrelevant for the war itself but ok, they won (fortunately) without needing a good navy in ww2, thats all i wanted to say
Oh you will know when it will come to the game. Whine will gonna be impressible.
unfortunately not. they waited for 2 years leaving naval in a state where it was very hard to impossible for 70% of ships to compete with the scharnhorst and a lot of times the team with the most scharnhorst won by drawing all attention to one guy sending it into your spawn being invincible. at least it didnt have the best guns long range. Then they introduced a barbette fire mechanic that let everyone playing it that didnt have the best crew explode with one hit to the barbette before being able to extinguish almost instantly, almost at a time where stronger competetition (now) arrived anyways.
Guess which ship has all that the scharnhorst ever made strong, but also has the best guns (in accuracy with 2 others) and best shells (with neglible less pen than yamato and Roma) but with shells that have 2x and 4x the he filler respectively. Maybe you guessed right its the soyuz that will kill naval top tier worse than the scharnhorst ever could.
idc, i just wanna play a playable and at least somehow balanced game man
It is playable and balanced in some way. US and UK got best planes at 8.7 France and Germans have good too. Souyz have no good AA.
1 Like
Except one of those nations cant use the 8.7 aircraft you mention