I dont know what you are talking about, when I play Russian or American 6.7 I can pen the turrets cheeks reliably every time.
“Cheeks” is a very inaccurate description. That would be the Tiger II P.
It’s literally two small strips.
You are also comparing to a tank a full BR above the KT, whilst not comparing US/Rus 5.7 to the KT
Not to mention that said tank is still quite capable on full uptier compared to others
2 Likes
I am not crying,
I agree, with you here, though the 76 Jumbo is not a brawler when uptiered and this is not what my suggestion is about, when you want this to change, do a Forum post yourself.
I’d also like people to react to my suggestion with what I said, and come up with things they think is unfair on other tanks, thx :)
1 Like
*and not come up
1 Like
We are talking about 75mm one that is on 5.7 and when uptiered meets Tiger II H.
Going by Your logic, Tiger II H should go up.
1 Like
Bloodie, 7.7 France is the least good you’ll find in the entire ground tech tree. Somua SM in fact is a tuff vehicle to fight because the volumetric goes crazy when you hit the turret base,
Some months ago Somua SM got this Major buff on the turret armor but the vehicle is not a problem, it has what every other heavy tank should have: armor, if you struggle to destroy it, focus on the very middle point of the turret you’ll get something with that.
What is this forum good for, when everyone who replies is just a biased yapping person, who just complaints against a suggestion of others, not doing constructive criticism and bringing the discussion on a whole new toptic with every reply?
If you dont have something serius to say about my suggestion, or are just biased against any german doing a suggestion, then please just go on an other forum or go talk about how bad german mains are on some discord server, please, this is not a constructive converation at all.
2 Likes
Yet this is not what my suggestion is about, either follow my topic or do a post yourself, if not, then I’d suggest you find a different forum post.
2 Likes
We just told you that there are multitudes of 5.7s who cannot penetrate the 6.7 tiger and you say we are “yapping” what kind of cope is that?
What we told you is extremely constructive and makes perfect sense.
“I can’t be invincible to a tank a full BR above me wah wah”
6 Likes
This is what Your suggestion is:
“I can’t deal with ‘X’ vehicle that is on +1 B.R. than my ‘Y’ vehicle, so uptier the ‘X’ vehicle”
If You want to suggest something it should apply to all, not just to what You want.
1 Like
The only construtive reply by now was his.
1 Like
Being faced with facts that Your own logic doesn’t stand when showed with different examples might hurt but this is what “constructive” discussion is.
You can’t expect rule to be applied to one scenario because “reasons”, when faced with another examples You start being defensive.
3 Likes
yet this suggestion just took the king tiger as an example, and the Somua SM as a “Target” to talk about.
I am not talking about anything in general, I am focusing on one tank, with an EXAMPLE tank.
If you have suggestions on how to fix BR’s do a post yourself, you are also forgetting how much cas America has over almost all BR’s.
1 Like
How are people supposed to make a constructive discussion when you only mentions the volumetric, which every tank suffers to and the BR placement something you can’t just create a suggestion post.
Overall is just you complaining about the vehicle, a major issue and something that you can’t change and can’t suggest to change. If your idea is moving to 8.0, like Gaijin did with the Char 25t, making a prototype heavy tank from the late 40s fighting something of the early 60s.
Tiger 2 H is 7.7?
And constructive criticism shows You different examples explaining that Your example doesn’t really mean anything.
You want a rule to be placed without others saying “well, if this is how it works, now move ‘x’ vehicle!”
Let us assume Somua is moved to 8.0 so Your tiger II H can’t face it, but then someone suggests to move Tiger II H to 7.0 because his M4A3E2 can’t face it, so Tiger II H is at 7.0 and again meets Somua. At what point will we stop?
Char 25t is the same br as the leopard 1 lmfao… If it was on the german or american tree it would be no higher than 6.7
7 Likes
Also, compare tanks of equal BR, Germany has M48A2 C at 7.7 and it’s HEATFS can easily penetrate this.
Marder A1 7.7 who’s MILAN can turn this into Swiss cheese.
Somua SM is a very potent threat in a down tier yes, but do you know what it would be fighting if it goes up? Fully stabilized APFSDS firing tanks with laser rangefinders, some of which have thermals, like the M60A3 TTS. It already fights similar tanks in a full up tier, like the M60A1 RISE (P) and T-55AMD-1 and T-55AM-1. The Somua SM only has AP rounds and is un-stabilized, being at a major disadvantage against tanks it fights in a full up-tier, and it’s supposed to be like that. All tanks when in a full up-tier will struggle. That’s just how it is and how it is supposed to be. Your not supposed to be on par with a tank a full br level above you.