There’s several other issues as well not listed by yourself but I’ve noticed post update, already mentioned elsewhere but will list again.
• H-39 has supposedly wrong armour belt thickness, Now I don’t exactly know this but our player Spanishavenger did mention this over on reddit that it’s missing armour
• L990 coaxial MG is impossible to fire in a burst. Also the commander MG cannot target aircraft like in GF (ie, you can aim up & fire without restriction)
• Audace has no fire directors nor HE-VT shells for the secondary armament. I brought this up with another & they went searching, it should’ve fire directors for both cannons types but in game doesn’t.
• HMS Danae has no HE-VT for the secondary 4"/45 Mk. XVI cannons, which is odd when the predecessing ship main batteries carry the same cannons & have HE-VT, ntm ships losted before HE-VT entred service have HE-VT but this doesn’t.
• Le Hardi can fire both primary & secondary batteries together, six 130 mm, two 25 mm, two 37 mm all under one binding
• USS Erie PG-50 floatplane model, also how it takes off lol…
An so history repeats itself… First the Emerald class cruiser & now the Erie class Patrol Gunboat. Both have a FAA static model while after launch it’s in a USN scheme.
I think that’s the only static model the devs have.
• NMS Mărășești being in the soviet tree vs italy…
What’s the point of the new system in regards to single ships but now two name if they don’t use it already? The new Vifor class destroyer should’ve also gone to Italy as NMS Mărășești damnit while the soviets could’ve still got the Lyogkiy or any other SU/IR design there’s, hell it could’ve been Engels instead ffs.
I think only VC-1 & Imperator Nikolai/ Nikolay Perviy aren’t screwed over, sidenote why is there two names for one ship?? The dev blog / wiki controdict each other? Welp guess only VC-1 is the only none odd addition
Браво!