yep
just like how its been on the CLAWS
9 Likes
basically the CLAWS
use the same documents as the CLAWS(given it has same radar) to bug report ig
5 Likes
Yep, still the same trash radar as CLAWS
The same two issues from the CLAWS have been sitting as “accepted” for six months now:
AN/MPQ-64 Radar Scan Rate Too Slow
AN/MPQ-64 Missing TWS ESA
I wouldn’t get my hopes up on them being fixed any time soon.
6 Likes
Yep.
Even with the reports I made, gaijin still treats the thing like a basic mechanical radar for some reason.
3 Likes
The NASAMS 3 does not use the AN/MPQ-64 radar,but at least the AN/MPQ-64F1 which has a faster scan rate and better acquisition of supersonic and/or low flying stuff such as helicopters,UAVs and cruise missiles. The NASAMS 3 has a better version of the F1 so it should even be faster.
Not only that,the NASAMS 2 brings the Data Link 16 update that massively raises the DL strength of the vehicle making it possible to track munitions very well.
Finally, the NASAMS 3 should also receive the electro-optical update that gives it the ability to passively launch missiles by giving it a pseudo IRST that both the AMRAAM-ER and the 9X can slave into
5 Likes
“not a bug”
1 Like
Oddly enough the AN/MPQ-64 thread has some citations that I grabbed about the F1 in particular, its pretty much the best 64 beyond the V3 at this time too.
Tbh though the CLAWs should be using the V3 and the NASAMS should have the F1, its very odd that gaijin chose to give it still the baseline, or whatever abomination they seemingly made instead of the actual recent versions of the system.
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/C5tdJJoVt2zl
Yeah my faith is gone,since the moderator linked a page where there’s no info of the standard MPQ-64 being used onto the NASAMS 3
5 Likes
Or just fix the basic sentinel radar that claws uses in general
1 Like
Im also gonna try to make a report on the missile’s speed, since I know it aint mach 2.68 for sure
try again I guess?
just gotta win report manager roulette
1 Like
Totally not surprised, the techmods beyond the scant few that actually talk on the forums might as well be single celled organisms.
You lucked out and got one of the many bad ones, imo, DM gunjob or one of the present, competent TMs on here and provide your information from here and then make the report.
Should have also added that mobile radar unit from the Konigsberg website since its the literal exact vehicle. Emphasize the fact that the F1 has that small panel up top which is indicative of the F1 as it is only present on the F1 and the original AN/TPQ-36A it seems, and the latter was only ever used with the original NASAMS.
Here is another Konigsberg source stating the F1 is used.
Should also be able to report the fact that its missing the EO guidance unit as well.
Here is also the 2025 brochure for the NASAMS 3.
Hell, I might remake your report with all of this Konigsberg stuff if you are up for it, already did the other reports they accepted but ignored.
4 Likes
Hey everyone, Just a small but important correction for anyone suggesting or discussing the American NASAMS 3 in-game (or future US ground forces tree):The US Army / USMC version of NASAMS 3 does not use the European-style Mercedes-Benz G-Wagon (G 290/G 300) as the high-mobility launcher platform that you commonly see with Norway, Netherlands, Lithuania, etc.Instead, the United States uses a dedicated HMMWV-based launcher developed by Raytheon/Kongsberg:
- Official designation: HML (High Mobility Launcher)
- Base vehicle: Up-armored M1152A1 HMMWV (2-door expanded capacity version)
- Carries 6 × AIM-120 AMRAAM / AMRAAM-ER or 6 × AIM-9X in ready-to-fire canisters
- First publicly shown: AUSA 2019
- Already in service with US Army air-defense units and used in several exercises (e.g., Fort Bliss 2021–2024)
- Fully integrated with the US AN/MPQ-64 F3R Sentinel radar and IBCS battle management system
Current in-game NASAMS (Norwegian version) correctly uses the G-Wagon, but if Gaijin ever adds the US NASAMS 3 battery, the proper high-mobility launcher should be the Humvee-based HML, not the Mercedes.
2 Likes
Yep, issue would be that I doubt gaijin has any interest in spinning up some separate models for the US version right now.
For now, I’d say we should get the European version sorted first since thats what gaijin has already made.
I’d love for the US version to actually use it’s proper vees as the humvee is fun to drive in game.
3 Likes
The HMMWV cant carry AMRAAM-ER as its too heavy for it, and everything else you just listed is already ingame in form of CLAWS lol
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/X4lOkfsDGv4g
Posting this here as it looks like someone else already made another go at the radar.
Tacked on the sources I found as well, hopefully this is enough to get them to see the light.
1 Like
Bug reports on this were ignored for 5 months already
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pqagHi62MWWV
Lol so the techmods selected the most recent report which had the least amount of info present and called all the earlier reports duplicates.
At least it was accepted.
2 Likes
Highlight them in the DEV update discussion thread or mention a moderator