Sooooo
The Namer currently weights 64.4 tons with only a bit of armor in the front and on the roof… right now the PUMA has more armor on the sides than the Namer even though it weights 21.4 tons less… there are many issues also like the back door is as thick as around ~20cm(200mm) and in the game its 30mm, also for some reason if a camera is being hit then everything related to the electronics goes down.
ALRIGHT ENOUGH TALKING LETS SHOW THE REAL DEAL!!!
MINIMUM GOTTA BE 400-500mm(around the same width as the tracks and even more)
NOW THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY, THINK WHATEVER YOU WANT GAIJIN BUT THERE IS LITERALLY ALMOST NO MORE PROOF THAN THAT AND ITS THE TIME TO USE THE THING IN YOUR HEAD CALLED BRAIN AND THINK WHY IT WEIGHTS 64.4 TONS AND I’LL GIVE YOU A HINT, THE MERKAVA MK4 TURRET DOES NOT WEIGHT 1.1 TONS AND NO, EACH CREW MEMBER DOES NOT WEIGHT THE SAME AS A YAG-10 TRUCK.
So then just raise it in BR. There’s plenty of other options for a 10.3 IFV for Israel, from the earlier Namers, to the Eitan, to the Achzarit.
The Namer RCWS-30 should be a lot higher, have much much better armor, and also have more spikes (along with some spike buffs lol).
Tbf tho, it would be just like the vilkas. Highly mobile with a lack luster amount of those lackluster missiles, and ofc a funny 30mm that doesn’t pen things all too well.
Namer would be much better off at 11.3 with proper armor and 2 extra spikes, I currently run it in my 11.3 lineup anyway with the AH60 and Kurnass 2000
