Have you tried contacting a tech mod about the reports?
you have no way of contacting them on the useless new sight they have, its a common theme actual bug reports are drowned in teh sea of useless and often clueless griping
You can send them a DM on the forum and ask if they could take a look / let you know why the report wasn’t forwarded.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Apologies your reports got missed, unfortunately it happens sometimes. I’ll take a look at these after work tomorrow.
Thanks bud, i make lots and my only responses i get tend to be “not a bug” even when it clearly is see my bug report for the fact the british float plane kingfishers have the usa skin the momment they launch or the shoddy damage models on some of the russian tank capolas, or they are simply forgotten like these or my report for the napalm bombs for the f-80, so at times it feels like i am screaming into the wind.
MaximumSomething and I already debunked the 45mm engine deck.
This one is more complicated, as I can’t remember if Gaijin use gross or net power. If it’s net then 330 is correct. If it’s gross, then it should be 375. As each engine was rated 125hp and there’s 3 of them.
130 is correct. MaximumSomething is right here.
This bug report is absolutely valid, 45km was achieved during vehicle driving trials.
I’ll have to double check this one, but the source you used is from before the vehicle was even constructed.
MaximumSomething is right here.
Please don’t take this as rude, the biggest issue with many of these is the sources you’ve used is preliminary. From before the vehicle was actually built and tested.
The fact its preliminary is not really relevant, looks over at how they buffed the bagelpanzer to the moon on preliminary documents, including one stating a naval mount for the source of the stabilization, with the naval mount being larger than the actual tank ;)