My long list of ignored bug reports for the A.C1

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
1

posted over a year ago and never acknowledged, even with the documentation affixed to back up each one:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IFqsmjIx5XiX
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Zzh1V70IvzV5
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UHN4XlREYBTd
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/X4Gs009jQrSB
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FoqAWnsnyuyq
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RQN2naUA2F0s

2 Likes
2

Have you tried contacting a tech mod about the reports?

1 Like
3

you have no way of contacting them on the useless new sight they have, its a common theme actual bug reports are drowned in teh sea of useless and often clueless griping

4

You can send them a DM on the forum and ask if they could take a look / let you know why the report wasn’t forwarded.

1 Like
6

@Gunjob is very good

2 Likes
7

Apologies your reports got missed, unfortunately it happens sometimes. I’ll take a look at these after work tomorrow.

2 Likes
8

Thanks bud, i make lots and my only responses i get tend to be “not a bug” even when it clearly is see my bug report for the fact the british float plane kingfishers have the usa skin the momment they launch or the shoddy damage models on some of the russian tank capolas, or they are simply forgotten like these or my report for the napalm bombs for the f-80, so at times it feels like i am screaming into the wind.

1 Like
9

All forwarded

1 Like
10

thanks a bunch bud :)

1 Like
11

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IFqsmjIx5XiX
MaximumSomething and I already debunked the 45mm engine deck.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Zzh1V70IvzV5
This one is more complicated, as I can’t remember if Gaijin use gross or net power. If it’s net then 330 is correct. If it’s gross, then it should be 375. As each engine was rated 125hp and there’s 3 of them.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UHN4XlREYBTd
130 is correct. MaximumSomething is right here.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/X4Gs009jQrSB
This bug report is absolutely valid, 45km was achieved during vehicle driving trials.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FoqAWnsnyuyq
I’ll have to double check this one, but the source you used is from before the vehicle was even constructed.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RQN2naUA2F0s
MaximumSomething is right here.

Please don’t take this as rude, the biggest issue with many of these is the sources you’ve used is preliminary. From before the vehicle was actually built and tested.

12

The fact its preliminary is not really relevant, looks over at how they buffed the bagelpanzer to the moon on preliminary documents, including one stating a naval mount for the source of the stabilization, with the naval mount being larger than the actual tank ;)