in that regard not sure what you used for it, but any datamined information is not useable in bug reports either way.
And you are guilty by association, if one of your followers used bots to artificialy increase the number of “likes” share same issue, you are responsible for that action as well
You misunderstood again. We calculated the explosive yield, which can be determined from the game itself. This is completely within the rules, and the issue has already been accepted
I have already stated that my evidence is sufficient. I have proven that the TNT equivalent value of DHL-1 explosive in the game is incorrect, and the issue has already been accepted by the official team.
Can some Moderator just close this topic? Its getting a bit annoying, as we already showed him why he got banned. Just akzept it learn from yoir mistakes
You clearly do not understand. I already explained that the statements from the three official sides are completely different. Isn’t this the biggest point of concern?
All of my statements and evidence are documented in the Issue Tracker report. The evidence has already been reviewed and acknowledged by the official team, and the report has been accepted. You can verify this yourself by checking the issue.
the intenet is lazy, just post the damn link next time, your statements will not be taken at face value until then.
and once again your botting issue you are completly ignoring the whole time.
And i am still questioning why the reporter even accepted those calculations, in any other case they likely would not be valid
A Community Manager said clearly why you got banned. You drived 20 000 persons to say, i have thr same problem, in the bug report site to vote, wich is considerd as spam. You just wanted that bug/problem to go viral, even do players who voted didnt (mybe) knew what was wrong. No bots was used, your not banned about that. 20 000 ,blindly" players drived by you voting to go sth viral → is considerd as spam. BASTA!
You misunderstood again. I was only saying that I have 20,000 followers, not that I asked all of them to come and help. In reality, only around a hundred people clicked on the issue.
Yes, their statements are completely contradictory. The Issue Tracker administrator claimed that I used bots, while customer support told me that it had nothing to do with bots. This is blatant defamation and false accusation.
Let me explain the background first. Within one week, four of my issues regarding improvements to Chinese vehicles were accepted. My evidence was very comprehensive and cannot be refuted.
By your logic i would deduce you to a troll, If the guy with screenshots and customer tickets is trolling then the guy refuting the evidence is trolling for attention.