T-80 vs abrams
My friend is saying the Abrams is better than t-80u what are you going to say to him to proven wrong
He is not wrong?
If you think everybody has their opinion so this topic is useless
T-80u have better armor / speed
M1a2 Sep have good turret armor / 5s reload time with 623mm of pen if you know how to use you will do good !
2 Likes
T-80U is “better” in that its more forgiving if you suck where as the Abrams has a higher skill level, but its better if you learn it
6 Likes
Ah so you mean about few points where he can be proven wrong.
T-80U has better speed while driving forward
It is smaller than Abram which can sometime be easy to hide
It will have same reload speed even if you lose one crew where as in Abram if you lose two crew your reload becomes slower
T-80U can sometimes be played without using much of your brain however you would need to use your brain for the Abram
T-80U turret basket is not linked to turret drive where as Abram turret basket is
T-80U does not have a giant turret ring weak spot
However all these point still do not change the fact that Abram is better than T-80s
2 Likes
As far as the M1s go I hardly ever get matched against the US. However when I did for nearly the first time yesterday I panic fired centermass at an Abrams with L26 and cut through them like butter. One Abrams smoked and I blind fired into the smoke and penned the turret cheek and set off ammo.
If that had been a T-80 I would have died multiple times over.
I would say the T-80u is better for most players, but as @dragonbank put it, the Abrams has a higher skill ceiling.
2 Likes
Both the Abrams and the T-80 are great tanks if you play them in the right way. These 2 tanks have different playstyles, and it will all come down to the player who plays them.
I heard that the t-90m is better bro because people around here say it is invincible, impossible to kill.
In real life, the Abrams is probably the best tank ever made. Since Uranium Armor Meanwhile, in real life, Russia’s T-series tanks are garbage at best. They suffer from terrible maintenance and poor overall reliability—broken and badly designed. They only look good on propaganda papers. Since War Thunder mainly relies on paper specifications, that’s why they perform decently in the game.
Please refrain from spewing garbage out of your ass :)
Abrams is better. He is not wrong.
Abrams has better reverse, gun handling, shells, reload, survivability, depression, ammo stowage, utility, among other things.