In my opinion, it will be better for being 11.3… It no match against the T-72B3. It performance is more alike the T-90A.
T-80u:
Good Mobility
No Laser Warning
Thermals
No APS
Slow Turret and gun traverse
Weaker Armor
Faster Reload
No access to 3MB60
Loud Engine
T-90A
Slow Mobility
Thermals
Laser Warning
Slow Turret and gun traverse
Better Armor
Access to 3MB60 (2nd Strongest APFSDS in the USSR)
The T-90A is more like the T-80U
If we compare T-72B3 to T-80U
T-80U
Good Mobility
No Laser Warning
Thermals
No APS
Slow Turret and gun traverse
Weaker Armor
Faster Reload
No access to 3MB60
Loud Engine
T-72B3
Decent Mobility
No laser warning
Thermals
No APS
Extreme fast Turret and gun transverse
Reload same as T-90A
Acess to 3MB60
Very Powerful Engine and more quiet
Lot of Armor.
The T-80U may look Powerful for now but when 12.7 Arrives it gonna be different and might not be as powerful as it used to be
It is kinda weird that it is as the same br as the E1 when the E1 is basically it but just straight up better in almost every way, the Swed one doesn’t have 3BM46 and is at 11.3 but the Soviet one does so i guess that why it is at 11.7.
This seems like another example of top tier compression than anything.
When gaijoobles did something bad and the Chinese playerbase review bomb them again i guess. If they really were gonna decompress they would probly increase to 12.3 then 12.7 first tho.
Abrams is very bad RN; their armour isn’t even accurate. If they ever are, they will be the most powerful.
But if we leave them there u sure they will survie against gen 4 tanks?
Considering nato armaments being nerfed then it might be ok but anyway when new tanks will be added then we could talk if its fair against them now im saying for the current state if the game its ok where it is
It’s way too op man I think it needs to go to 12.0 and also remove the 3bm46 bro it is frontally impenetrable by everything. Since I don’t even play it what do I know right hehe I heard this tank is invincible