they are pretty bad imo, specially RDF, its slower worse reverse speed, worse armor(you can be 7.2mm from the sides and 50cal’d from the front), the only good thing abt it is more ammo, they should move both down to 11.3, it really wouldnt be the end of the world, really
2 Likes
If you said this pre buff, then I would agree however with the dramatic increase in ROF, we’ll have to wait and see how good these tanks perform.
I have a strong feeling the RDF/LT will end up like the 2S38. the HSTVL will most likely remain the same because it’s constrained by it’s ammo count and it’s rate of fire only reduced by 0.5 seconds.
2 Likes
The RDF is a direct sidegrade, and both are potent.
HSTVL, RDF, and 2S38 have always been potent for their BRs when used correctly.
Lol not a chance, The 2S38 is still vastly superior in almost all respects bar the mobility of the HSTV-L.
The RDF/LT is going to be a joke regardless of it’s rate of fire solely due to it’s BR placement and the ammo itself.
Even with the change you are paying for a flat out worse HSTV-L at the same BR.
2 Likes
Ah yes, defending the 2S38 from criticism by using propaganda.
Time for me to defend the HSTVL from slander.
HSTVL fires a superior round, has better optics, better profile, vastly superior mobility. The exclusive downside is thermal generation cause HSTVL was made in the 1990s.
RDF is slightly slower than HSTVL and faster than 2S38.
Funny your post is claiming that the 2nd best autocannon ammo in the game is a joke. Which means your post has to argue 2S38’s ammo is unplayable or your post has double standards.
No.