The other three require money to use. And people most certainly do use them to complete events and pad stats. But because they cost money to use, you simply see less of them.
1 Like
Amused to see when people make a rant post in response to your’s. Always an amusing day.
1 Like
Every nation has it’s own ranking rules. That’s why this happens
Except the grinders already have Tier II event vehicles that they are allowed to use, making it even easier for them as there are no other more experienced players for them to deal with.
1 Like
I didn’t say it was a good plan… When was the last time Gaijin did anything 100% right?
1 Like
Weren’t the Hungarian helis originally in their own seperate branch in the dev server for Sons of Attila and then Gaijin made the conscious decision to make it one straight line? lol
Agree,F6F5 should be rank3
This looks like a typo - i assume you wanted to write “Rank 3” as the OP refers to “downranking” of the Hellcat from Rank III to Rank II.
If my assumption is right: If you look closer your argument is only valid for US planes.
Yes you have early war (1939/40) 109s and Spitfires Including VBs sitting at Rank II, but 1941 is usually the step to get to rank 3. Have in mind that even such things as LaGG 3s were “brand new” for the USSR in 1941 and sit at BR 2.0…
If i combine your “enjoyable” with this quote:
with the sane tenor “fun” it is obvious that you both mentioned the same:
Planes being “enjoyable” or “fun to play” is a classical indicator that it performs way too good for its BR.
I never read anything similar about a Swedish J-22 B at 3.7 (non- iconic) or about the C 205 at 3.0 (Iconic) or the Bf 109 E-4 sitting a BR 3.0 (very iconic). Main example of non-iconic and non-fun: S-199/Sakeen - totally helpless in a full uptier, sitting at a BR of 3.3 but at rank IV.
In other words: You see the proof that BRs and Ranks are not really connected - as totally different parameters determine BRs and Ranks.
As it is no clubber plane in Air RB i fully agree too.
Indeed I did.
1 Like