Releasing the F2G conceptual plane, broke late war prop BR and as long as this thing remains in this game/gamemode, it will be fuel for never ending debates. Bringing it up to 7.0 would at least make 5.7 more playable again. But in my opinion it should be completely removed from realistic and simulator battles.
Or add a mode without BR where planes from their actual time have clashed. Like that we could still keep battlerating + have this as a feature.
There is no way the f2g is bad it is either a skill issue or it does not match your play style firstly the f2g is amazing for its br
1.your ammo almost never runs out and you don’t even have to aim because the tracers do the job for you
2.your Survival rate is very high I have been in situations where I tanked somany rounds I shouldn’t have but if you are shot your performance instantly shatters so I suggest to run back to base
3.the guns do surprisingly unrealistic amounts of damage compared other guns and even cannons take the shvaks on the Russians which are utter garbage and do not damage at all
4. performance is also very good many planes can’t even reach you because it can climb and climb for ages this is where almost all American planes at this br perform best
In conclusion the F2g is almost unrealistic in nature in contrast to what you have commented about it, if you play it like it is supposed to be played and not simply sit at low altitude skimming attackers and bombers if can be one of the best planes at the br
No. It is arguably undertiered but it should be 6.3 or 6.7 max
true the f2g is over powered most of the time