and?
Overperforming is Overperforming, you cant cherry pick without making it unfair.
The German one was ok at best at 8.7 and really didn’t need to be 9.0 IMO.
If so, it should be fixed and moved down, instead of moved up (even tho it didn’t need to be).
Agreed, realism first and then set the BR apporpriately after that.
Not what they seem to be doing a lot recently, in that they set the vehicles performance to match a desired BR or overall performance state.
If it can have aim9Ls then can it also get IRIS-T?
No because the alpha jet was retired way before iris-t service but they did propose asraam iirc
Though IRIS-T and ASRAAM were desired to be compatible with Aim-9 rails, so in theory… they could have done so if the timings had lined up
In theory if they ever used alpha jet long enough. But that didn’t happen
Ok
just use ground belts and dogfight. you outturn everything even sabers for a short moment. take advantage before u lose to much energy and u can delete planes
Gunna quickly comment on this bit.
The Gripen has access to the PELE-T rounds that replace the PT rounds and gains an additional HEF belt that increases its effectiveness whilst also swapping the SAPHEI with straight APHE.
So yes, the Gripen’s 27mm has a greatly more effective Anti-Air belt compared to any other BK27 user, including the Typhoon that has an accepted report to change its ammo. There is also related reports such as this one for the Tornado getting a greater amount of HEF. But ive never found the gun on either the Typhoon or Tornado all that lacking overall (I cant view the available belt selection for the Alpha jet because its an external weapon, kinda a dumb setup of the wiki, but Im assuming it has the same selection as the Typhoon and Tornado), I would like to see both buffed, but I wouldnt describe the BK27 without corrected rounds as “one of the worst guns in the entire game”. Its actually very solid overall imo.
Now whether the Alpha jets should get changed belts is up for a debate. Technical compatibility argument could argue that all BK27s users should get access to the same belts, but at the same time, as a trainer, it makes sense for the Alpha jet to actually be using PT rounds. I have no idea though what or even if any sources exist for what the Alpha jet actually used IRL. Ive looked, but cant find any bug reports (which doesnt mean much, the website sucks when looking for something specific). But if you are finding the Air belts lacking, try switching to the Stealth belts. Ive always found they shredded on the Typhoon and Tornado
Though I will agree that 30mm DEFA and ADEN are very challenging guns to use overall, but they do pack a hell of a punch when you entirely relearn how to aim and land rounds with them. I still suck with them, but slowly getting better. The Challenge is that all your muscle memory from using basically any other weapon in game is not just worthless, but actually a hinderance.
1 Like
the fact you’re accusing me of using LLMs because i am one of the few who writes cohesive texts instead of throwing internet jargon is enough telling that you ARE the one using LLMs
I’m fully against AI.
I mentioned your double standards, and all you decided to do is lame strawmanning.
The Alpha jet is not an attack aircraft, it’s a trainer multirole aircraft.
Plus, is there any proper footage that I turn fights against zero while playing Corsair?
I think not.
No footage needed, your speech pattern is the exact same one of those who cry in bombers when they die to fighters or, as i said, cry about zero being OP while still turnfighting it.
I’ve found out people are lately accusing me of being an AI or LLM abuser just because I write in a modern standard english instead of throwing “bro” or “dawg” or “sixty seven” type lingo into the comments i make.
F-4F should get its Iris-T to compensate for its total lack of radar missiles.
2 Likes
German A Jet is 7.7 at best. It was stupidly overBRd back then when it was only 8.7. Getting mogged by early jets but people glaze it because it’s a fly by wire with good roll rate. The Sea Fury also has good roll rate and gets shidded on by early mustangs, speed, engine and maneuver wise.
TLDR; lack of reading capability.
You literally didn’t understand what I meant by that convo.
I mentioned your double standard, then you suddenly came up with silly strawmanning.
So, with that level of lack of Reading Capablity, you might need to use LLM AI to get a proper TLDR;
At least, an LLM wouldn’t strawman like you do.
According to in-game classification, no.
Alpha jets are clearly classified as strike aircraft. Also known as Attack Aircraft.
Just like Yak-130.
‘But it is Gaijin’s silly classification which is different compared to IRL’ Haha. No. Blame yourself last year; you dismissed Harrier options because it is an attacker when SHAR FRS.1 were Fighter jets of the FAA IRL, iirc.
Your boomerang traveled long journey and hit your own forehead. Enjoy!
If you want to say something confident, you need to bring proper evidence to support that claim.
“You sound like them” cannot be evidence.
I really wonder why you want to frame me like that.
Because you have no capability to win an argument without Ad Hominem or fallacies?
Bring the replay footage or shut up about that.
If your speech is ‘Modern Standard English’… it seems you are having different definition for ‘Modern standard english’.
“Just let me get delusional buff on planes which I like, to stomp other counterparts.”
You really want to place Alpha Jet A at an even lower BR than Meteor F.8 or Vampire FB.5, and make it have the same BR as F-84G or Ouragan?
If you lost against P-51 (Allison) or P-51C while you are playing Sea Fury, it is just your problem.
It might not be as good as Spitfire LF Mk. IX CW or Yak-3U, but man, ‘get shidded by early mustangs’?
Also, it seems the conversation about Sea Fury is Off-Topic.
If you lost against P-51 (Allison) or P-51C while you are playing Sea Fury, it is just your problem.
It might not be as good as Spitfire LF Mk. IX CW or Yak-3U, but man, ‘get shidded by early mustangs’?
Also, it seems the conversation about Sea Fury is Off-Topic.
It’s not off topic, it’s literally a valid tangent comparison. No, I never died to a Sea Fury, EVER. Same how I never lost a dogfight to an F-5 in any of the planes I use that can face it, except against Riki Bosnia on controlled 1v1s when I was still noob in the MiG19PT. I’ve even dogfought The 6th Army on the tu2s against his sea fury and I could boom and zoom the living hell of him until i critted him. He got sent into a flatspin by one of my teammates and I took him out definitely.
I can say the same when you lose your dogfights on harriers (which can rawdog anything if you knew how to viff) but you’d get offended and pull the victim attacker card. I’ve been using attackers as gunfighters since always and they score my best results in dogfight success, with one of the best ones being the A-1 Mauler, with which I outfought ta152H and yak3P and with Su-25 with which I could out dogfight pretty much anything at it’s BR.
“Just let me get delusional buff on planes which I like, to stomp other counterparts.”
You really want to place Alpha Jet A at an even lower BR than Meteor F.8 or Vampire FB.5, and make it have the same BR as F-84G or Ouragan?
Notice how i’m asking the AJA to return to it’s original 8.7 BR, not 7.7, learn to read before you accuse me of bad reading comprehension. Although I believe you actually read but prefer to ragebait me.
I mentioned your double standard, then you suddenly came up with silly strawmanning.
So, with that level of lack of Reading Capablity, you might need to use LLM AI to get a proper TLDR;
At least, an LLM wouldn’t strawman like you do.
LLMs are known for being the ultimate strawmantrons. But go off, you ain’t coming out as cool but cringe with these L tier comebacks.
According to in-game classification, no.
In game classification can kiss my feet. The game tags as “attack aircraft” anything that is a subsonic trainer.
But it is Gaijin’s silly classification which is different compared to IRL’ Haha. No. Blame yourself last year; you dismissed Harrier options because it is an attacker when SHAR FRS.1 were Fighter jets of the FAA IRL, iirc.
I still told you every time to learn how to viff and make the Harrier an actual dogfighter because it can certainly be one.
Your boomerang traveled long journey and hit your own forehead. Enjoy!
Turbo gaslight.
If you want to say something confident, you need to bring proper evidence to support that claim.
You’re not a good duelist, you choose planes you refuse to learn and you refuse to take advice or search for it. This is the same mindset of the type of people who keep turn fighting zeroes on planes 500kmh faster than them and cry about it. I can certainly tell by your stubbornness that you still hadn’t learn how to use a plane as a fighter, because you yourself are the first one to admit it, starting with the fact that you main attackers.
L2P, L2Ragebait. Alpha Jet is bad, the gun is the worst in the entire jet range, with ten shells literally dealing less damage than a single 50 cal, and FBW trainers are bad at dogfighting because, as the classification says, they’re trainers, so they aren’t going to respond instantly in game as in real life (unless commanded NOT to do so) this is why the yak130, the alpha jet and similar ones will pull 3g’s at the start before pulling 10 plus if you continue to press nose up.
If you flag this post, you’re petty.
Non FBW actually fly better than alpha jet, yak130 and Harrier trainer precisely because standard FCS IS NOT restrictive like trainer FBW which will pull very gently at the start and will only pull hard if you continue pushing the nose up key. Because, they’re TRAINERS. And trainer jets are programmed to do that, but can also be programmed to NOT do that.
If you want to believe like that, in your reality, go on.
Comparing the Strike jet, which has two Snecma engines, with a late-war piston fighter that has a Bristol Centaurus engine and historically had speed as an advantage…
You were the one who was playing the 'it is worse than early Mustang ’ trope, no?
If you really think it is worse than early Mustangs such as A-36, P-51, P-51C, then it is your skill issue. :/
Anecdotal fallacy, and off topic. Blowing your own horn about War Thunder skill does not help with your 'lack of logical capability '.
Another brick of wall, which is nothing but self-praise. Seriously.
- AV-8B Harrier 2 is also a Harrier but not ‘those harriers’ which cannot dogfight well even with VIFF.
AV-8B has a bigger wing, which gives a better turn ratio. Think about why SHAR FRS.1/AV-8S Late are 11.0BR while AV-8B(NA) hits 11.3BR.
You only flew with AV-8B and rationalise your bollocks against Harrier I.
It is like claiming P-47 is a great turnfighter because A-10 turns well and both are Thunderbolts. Ffs.
- You were the one who told me that “Fly a fighter instead, it is your fault who unlocked Su-17 instead of MiG-21”. So I am telling you, mirroring your older take, that
“If you don’t like Yak-130 and Alpha Jet. Then it is your fault that you didn’t unlock a fighter. Does MiG-15bis beat both? Then you should’ve unlocked MiG-15bis instead of those attackers.”
I am talking about your double standard, which makes you have no credibility in making threads.
Friendly reminder:
You were the one who mentioned that
- Alpha Jet A is 7.7 at best.
- It was stupidly overBRd back then when it was only 8.7.
It was your take. Not mine.
They need to hand the trophy over to you.
Ofc LLMs are always making words, hallucinating about things.
Just as you do, and at least LLMs run a Google search before doing some shite to check their take.
TLDR; Both you and LLMs are strawmantrons but you are the worst one compared to others.
Because their IRL role isn’t a supersonic fighter, which is designed to fight against enemy main air force jets.
We both know that Gaijin’s classifications are bollocks
But somehow you cherry-pick whichever you like.
Look up; I already explained why it is bollocks up there.
AV-8B ≠ AV-8A/C/S, SHAR.
Projection and another strawmanning. You cannot make words without an ad hominem card, no?
-
Of course I won’t. AND I know you will yap to me if someone else flags it, then frame me as petty. Even if you don’t have evidence that I flagged it or not.
You are already dropping tons of strawmanning, so adding one another wouldn’t hurt much. -
Also, I see no reason why I shouldn’t use my best option: ‘flagging the rule-violating post and letting mods handle it, for saving our time and a better community’, and need to waste my time. Unless I want to make you silent. :/ But fine. I won’t flag it.
What are you trying to do here?
1 Like
Ragebait ig
I thought he replied to me about the same thing and I ignored him the first time