More vehicles more varieties per tech tree

Machinery of War Discussion Nations not present in WT
,
1

An idea on how to spread out vehicles in the tech trees better.

We keep getting countries that don’t have tech trees and with it more vehicles, which I am all for but I don’t agree with how they decide on placing the vehicles, they gave the Leopard 2A4M, a Canadian tank to Germany, why? yea its originally from Germany but another tank with the same boring stats as the rest of the German tech tree, give it to their neighbors the USA.

Leopard 2 PL, another tank that is used in Poland, yea it borders Germany but like the 2A4M its practically the same tank, give it to the USSR as strange as it sound. VF-14A IRIAF, give it to Russia, give them a taste of the F14 for a price, as it is, modern day Iran is a Russian ally not American, those 2 despise each other nowadays, they were allies in the 70’s not today.

M1A1 AIM an Australian used tank give it to the UK, the US has enough M1’s. TAM 2IP give it to the closest country that has a tech tree the US. The AH-64A (GR), why of all countries did you give it to the States, give it to a country who doesn’t operate it like Italy. Why not the Tigre HAD-E give it to the UK, they have so few helicopters as is, give them more options.

there are a lot more but be honest with your self, who wants the same vehicle at the highest level, let everyone try these tanks, this as well extends to the aircraft and ships, spread them out, don’t organize it through the country that built it but the closest to it or a country that doesn’t have the said vehicle.

Examples: South Korean operates the T-80U, once added to the game give it to the States since they’re so close allies, Cyprus has 82 T-80U’s give them to Italy once added, closest country to it, almost half of the would have tested or operated the T-72, for example the US has tested most soviet tanks because they either captured them during war or were given to them by allies who got their hands on them.

give other countries vehicles to every tech tree that doesn’t have said vehicle, it’ll make the game more fun and exciting not having the same vehicle covering your entire end game tech tree, that way you can try new different vehicles and still have a fresh feeling in game, thoughts?

1 Like
2

I have an idea, never post again.

8 Likes
3

Give the USA tech tree to the UK as a sub tree next

3 Likes
4

So… you want to remove tech trees from the game?

2 Likes
5

He wants to start a beef like when the F-14A IRIAF was announced: some wanted for USSR due to the Russo-Iran relations today and others because it’s American technology.

6

Elite tier ragebait, USA does not need a Canadian leopard or a South Korean T-80U

I’d rather see either completely new vehicles (Vulcan family for example) or mods/upgrades of existing vehicles done and operated by the country.

Hopefully there’s gonna be more trees so more spots available

Wouldn’t this just exasperate the problem? If you play one nation, you play em all if we’re trying to use insane stretches to justify all vehicles going to all trees.

The only remotely justifiable ones there is the IRAF F-14 and M1A1 AIM. The Iranian F-14 as Russia and Iran actually work in the military sector together and Iran doesn’t have many other friendly nations, nor enough domestic low tier vehicles for a tree. Australia and the UK are close partners in defense and every prior Australian vehicle went to the UK tree.

Don’t even get me started on this encouraging breadcrumbing nations solely so most nations are reduced to giving a tree another nations “flagship” vehicle where 90% those vehicles will have no difference.

7

A grind without borders I guess

1 Like