It 's actually most likely still there; visual models are interchangeable between WT and Mobile, but WTM hides unused animated parts to save on resources - the stub and weathering for the RUR-5 location are present, the same as it looks on Chikugo here in WT when the launcher 's textures are hidden:
Not too concerned about ASROC as it had no anti-surface capability. However, the Knox class Frigates generally had a couple of Harpoon missiles loaded into the launcher alongside the ASROCs since there was no separate AShM launcher fitted.
Later ASROC launchers could launch RGM-84 Harpoon and RIM-24 Tatare SAMs
Not all countries upgraded though and the Japanese were one of those. There were also those ships that simply maintained separate systems even when it could have been possible.
Yep. Two more Sevastopol-class, three Imperatritsa Mariya-class, one Izmail-class, one Imperator Nikolai I-class, four Sovetsky Soyuz-class, one more Kronshtadt-class, three Stalingrad-class, and Arkhangelsk (formerly HMS Royal Sovereign).
Still lots to add for the Russian tree, though they will inevitably have the “weakest”/smallest collection of battleships.
I don’t think Project 23 class(aka Sovetsy Soyuz class) battleship would come in number of four. Those sisters does not have difference in design, which makes Z-46 and Z-47 implemented together. Same stands for Project 82 class (aka Stalingrad class) as there are no difference in design of two sisters. Actually Izmail class can be in at least three according to those principle as they have different engines.
For Sevastopol… only one remains now, Ganguat(aka Oktabryskaya Revolutsiya)
The collection, or line-up would be the weakest point of future top BR soviet navy. Only with one Project 23
Made a rough future TT for Russia, seems feasible.
Earliest DDGs fires inertial guided missiles meaning they can’t do mid course correction and can bridge gap between BBs and the newer missile ships. Could totally see gaijin working on them already.