Im really not concerned with BR’s anymore, we demanded for years decompression and now we have the F16A sitting 12.3 which can face off against F4E , J8B and so on and so on.
it really doesnt matter does it
I remember when i started all these mixed trees were actively denied. Then all of a sudden weve got leopards in about half the trees in game,
We dont need all this export sht theres so much unique stuff still missing from individual nations.
its sad tbh
likely russian mains are annoyed that the mig28 is going ot britain xD
why is it going to britain
Mig 28?
little F5 copy
You keep cycling around issues that may only be affected by Gaijin.
Compression, sub trees and such.
We can argue all we want about those matters but it is a waste of time ultimately since Gaijin has to move it’s position on these matters for any change to happen.
We can only tell you what the situation is.
Personally I would have added Belgium to France, the Netherlands to Germany and no Swiss sub tree at all in favour of puttinh those vehicles into the nation of the developing industry.
Alas that doesn’t matter one bit.
I only want a well balanced IIIS in game no matter which tech tree.
F-16A is a rather mixed bag.
We are only getting the Flz Lwf LL 63/75, sadly. IRL We went up to Flz Lwf LL 63/91 (AIM-9P4)
At 10.3 to boot.
Mirage IIIC/E and 5 are a joke at this point.
It should be 12.7 mate, It is fantastic at 12.3
Yeah I agree, I do not see why the games as mixed as it is now. its pointless af
this statement makes absolutely zero sense, gaijin controls everything in the game regardless of what we say, so what we should all sit and say nothing? question none of it¿
With only 9L it’s not having an easy time. The flight performance will only carry you so far.
Perhaps in another section of the forum.
What? I was questoning hte mirage, in the mirage post. That is all
where would you like me to go hm?
What? the thing stomps like mad man I loved it at 12.3 xD
also you’ve a near 3.0 KD with it as well to boot.
this is pointless here. Take it easy man
P5 even: The P4 was only purchased as interim solution bfore the P5 came, and were only used as training missiles with no motor. The advantages of the P5 (IRCCM, smokeless motor) were irrelevant for training, so the P4 sufficed in that role…
Sorry my typo
Flz Lwf LL 63/91 (AIM-9P5)
Flz Lwf LL 63/90 (AIM-9P4)
2 Likes
I’m in favour of AIM-9P4. AIM-9B/E/J/P are a bad joke at 10.3 most of the time.
Mirage IIIC suffers because it has Magic 1, Mirage 5 suffers because it has Magic 1, Mirage 5BA has the pelasure of facing 11.3 jets because it has countermeasures and Mirage IIIE faces MiG-23MLD and others becuase it has Magic 1 as well as countermeasures.
Kfir C.2/C.7 suffer because Gaijin overestimates Paython 3 which is about as flare resistant as any R-60.
I bet Mirage IIIS would be 11.7 or 11.3 with AIM-9P5.
ATM it looks a bit Frankenstein style: The airframe with canards and CMS launcher for sure is post KAWEST 85, and would make sense to include AIM-9P-5 and a BR of more than 10.3, I find.
3 Likes
Classic Gaijin.
According to Chat-GPT, the Taran-18 is a PD radar. Is that accurate or is that Chat-GPT being Chat-GPT?
Chat-GPT.
Never heard the TARAN is PD, but I’ll check to confirm…
3 Likes
Nah, my books confirm it’s just a regular monopulse radar without look down capability.
But it did have a Swiss developed EEGS component…
4 Likes
This variant is not used by the French
5 Likes