Swiss Tree was not even needed, really
But also subtrees fill in gaps, which the Mirage IIIS does not really do
And the argument isn’t “Well Gaijin already did something stupid” its “Gaijin should not do the stupid things they’re doing”
france should have gotten it before this shitty and useless subtree being added then.
Yes, I have the need and several other too.
its not matter of gap needing fixed. german plane would suffice for that.
its matter of country being added as subtree, with plane that was operated exclusively by the airforce of the country thats being added as subtree.
1 Like
They added the IIIS to Germany before the MirSIP to BeNeLux, preferences methinks
1 Like
Ok, but if the subtree is stupid why should it get support
The fact it exists as a subtree isn’t my argument, it’s that the way they did it is dumb as hell
like it or not, its how things are.
and why is it stupid?
it differs in no way how other subtrees were introduced. they all get vehicles they operated, some of them being export variants.
Subtrees are added to fill in gaps that cannot be filled by the nation
Task failed
It differs in no way other subtrees came in, which, by the way, were also stupid
benelux is real joke,i know so much things about belgians equipement,beside doing stupid copypaste they didn’t any interesting vehicle beside the fokker (that is dutch…) belgium had so much potential,but i know gaijin won’t ever do something about that! its way more better to add like?? A PREMIUM DUTCH F5!
i say it again,subtrees really are the worst,gaijin,please stop doing those if its only to add copypastes.
3 Likes
Premium shoulda 100% been the EX with an NG for tech tree
It’s just laziness
not exclusively. subtrees are also added to introduce a country that operates unique domestic vehicles but not enough of them to form a standalone TT.
thats your subjective opinion.
and even more when they add subtrees to nations that’s really don’t need them. (germany already have kind of a subtree beside swiss…)
for real.
That’s also the opinion most people have
The feedback on subtrees has been visibly negative
And this shows why
You give France Leopards, Germany Mirages, you remove uniqueness and block out the demand for domestic vehicles, now guess what? 1 step forward 15 steps back, good job!
and see,some people still support that dumb idea…
with people like that,i really don’t wanna see how war thunder will looks like in 5 years,
what’s next? poland subtree for russia? leopards and f16 for russia lets go!.
this really need to stop now.
“thats a nice argument senator, why dont you back it up with a source?”
on poorly implemented subtrees that offer mostly copypaste when there are unique designs aviable.
swiss mirage IIIS is going to swiss subtree. there is no justification for it to go to france, unlike with CLOVIS and DF105.
adding it to france too would further dilute the uniqueness of the tree without any justification, unlike with dutch Leo2A4 being in benelux subtree, which are vehicles that served with dutch army and as such they need to go whenever dutch vehicles are.
1 Like
You expect to be spoonfed a source? Dude its called looking.
Swiss Mirage III should have gone to France long before a Swiss subtree was even a concept (even though its poorly done as-is and not needed) because its a French jet, just as the Leopard should have gone to Germany and not France
mirage III > french
swiss 2nd most spoken language > french
- an aircraft designed for the swiss market already in the french tree
that’s enough justification,swiss could have been a subtree for france too.
(even if i don’t want a swiss subtree in france,just that damn mirage.)
we can take the example of the leopard2a4can
should have been in US tree or UK tree??
why its in germany then?
gaijin really seems to don’t have any logic at this point.