That would be disgusting.
And the Tomcats are compatible with AMRAAMs and the MiG-23s are compatible with R-73s.
Loadouts are a balancing tool by the Devs and I speculate that they also want to keep some individuality between the between the nations.
We’ve arrived at a point where we are grinding planes for their ordinance, not the planes themselves. What’s the point in grinding 3 different top tier planes when you can grind the Gripen that can do it all?
1 Like
Well that might be, since aside from the J-10, the only other 13.7’s I have are the F-16C/F-15C.
its not, its 20kg difference
even if it would be only by 20 kg, its still heavier, which in a dogfight between those 2, with same skilled pilots, would be a disadventage.
you have 32 large flares + spirale if you are having troubles with that…
i didnt say i have “troubles with that”, i pointed out that 2000d rmv just has more cm, which is true
yes the br is kinda stupid but we dont have to make up stuff
its not “kinda stupid” its “really stupid”, also what did i made up?
my guess its due to the removed air refuel capability
While the 5F/5mk2/-9 represent all mirage 2000-5/-9 family it should have everything while the 5EI actually represents only the 5EI so why not (aside from the Éclair M flare dispenser)
Are you asking why does the Taiwanese Mirage 2000-5 not have gound strike capability?
asking that there is no MICA-IR ever on Mirage 2000-5EI (since they never ever recieved such missile)
1 Like
no im pretty sure they bought some
show me proof,… they (Taiwan) never bought the MICA-IR (they have bought the MICA-EM, not the IR)
Isn’t that a Magic 2 trainer?
1 Like
Ah i think it is, now that i think about it. So yeah the Taiwanese mirage 2000 will probably not get the Mica IR in game
Well I am slowly warming up to the 2000EI, it has just taken me this long to get used to the play style and overcome my skill issue. The mirage absolutely hates being at or above mach 1, so flying it slow is something I had to get used to.
Only because Gaijin killed any AoA ability from Delta wing design.
Game balance decision because “MiCa ToO StRoNg, MuH” players.
1 Like
Except they didn’t. it is bad, all delta wing aircrafts have this issue, including MiG-21s and JA37, they all have issues of high drag at high AoA.
I really like the MICA so far, although the BVR is … I mean I gave up doing any BVR after being failed by R77s so they do fit my style of playing but yeah, not ideal, would really like them to introduce MICA-IR soon as well as MICA-M.
they made a FM change some updates ago, which refrainned Mirage2000 to take any AoA, turning it into a flying brick at high speeds (over 700km/h) basically.
if you make a test, there is great chances that MiG-21’s will pull more AoA than Mirage 2000 past that speed.
MICA-IR is doomed to wait up for missiles as capable as it is,… IR wise, there is none today (60km range and IRCCM 50G ability + LOAL Datalink pursuit)
MICA-EM lacks 37.5% max range(IRL: 80km - in-game: 50km) in game files, been proved mutliple times, by multiple reports, but nothing is actionned because the MICA-EM is “too good at the moment”
R-77 have currently no problem Range Wise (80km in game // earliest R-77 only reached 70km IRL)
the problem came from guidance systems being oversimplified.
and even if Gaijin adds Rafale F.4 - MICA-NG(IR or EM) would not be implemented per balance, i even doubt Meteor will ever be implemented on the F.3R
I mean regarding delta wing I can only say it is relatively accurate, aligns with what I have seen as well as what generally applies delta wings. Also it is to do with the control surfaces, which are not independent like on MiG21. With MICA that is all the ARHs, PL12 has 100km and is down to 80, generally similar, everything is nerfed, same with MICA.
I don’t want to further this off topic, but I’m interested to see which country thay operates the F-5C with CM dispenser, can you tell me?
