I guess that’s because the hype for that aircraft, and the Taiwanese Mirage being the end of the line. My guess it would died out when J-10 will be buffed or China receive new aircraft other than newer J-10. I remember that when the Belgian F-16 arrives in French Tech Tree, I see Belgian F-16 more often than Mirage 2000. So I think it would be the same with the case of Taiwanese Mirage 2000.
Welp, fingers crossed on Gaijin then.
Utter copium right here, i barely have any russian tanks, spaded even less, i have 3 air nations top tiered and played all relatively equally. My most invested ground nations are germany and japan. If you are going to blatantly lie and drag this thread off topic because you dislike my opinion then i shall have to treat you like a child and get a moderator involved
If they add jf17 in a modern block, with pl12, hmd and everything else, I think it will be no worse than j10.
And to be honest, I like the JF 17 more externally than the j10a. Still, it doesn’t have a very nice air intake
Most likely block II since block III uses an Aesa and newer generations of IR missile
It’s the amalgamation of J-7 and F-16, it is indeed a beauty of its own. There is a reason why J-10 is called Temu Eurofighter lol.
Try not to embrass yourself by lying even more please.
Japan doesnt even come close to Russia while Germany competes with it, so you’re lying again.
By all means call mod so he can see how toxic and arrogant you are.
But this is not the first time you acted like this considering how many times i saw your toxic comments before.
I am hoping gaijin will consider adding a Lavi but also the J-10b TVC and gove it weapons, would allow J-10 to keep up with Su-30sm/35 in a dogfight and would make dogfight maneuvers very enjoyable
By the way, r-Darter is installed on the JF 17. The missiles are not bad… By the way, I do not know if they installed full-fledged PL12S on JF 17 block 2, and not stripped-down sd-10s.
And yet i have every japanese tank minus about 4, whereas my russian tree looks very bare, and i only grinded it for tunguska?
Well done, you showed i only have 7 tanks with over 100 matches is russia, far from maining it
Hi! Please remember to keep discussions respectful and avoid personal remarks. Constructive dialogue is essential to maintaining a positive community environment. Let’s focus on discussing gameplay or mechanics instead of engaging in personal conflicts."
Yet you only played with Type-16FPS and TKX(P), how interesting, meanwhile you used more Russian tanks and played with the more.
Kinda defeats your whole argument.
Sure, dont forget to remind this thing to other people as well instead of directly quoting me.
And now, we drift from Mirage 2000 once again. If you want to talk skill issue and personal matters, just go into private messages
I did remind you multiple times to stay on topic?
No one was having any issue until you arrived, suddenly with you showed up topic drifted away.
Safe to say you’re the main reason why this thread became like this.
Back on topic then, is there any avionic upgrades to MICA EM over it’s lifespan? New radar or tech and the likes?
The obvious one is MICA NG EM. Bigger sustainer thanks to the size reduction of the electronics, meaning better range. The seeker also goes to the AESA technology. Only the Rafale F4 is going to use it for now.
Until then, I don’t think we’ll have any major modifications. However there are report of the current MICA performances, be it drag or seeker
Also MICA lacks smokeless motor reported by @DirectSupport , if MICA have smokeless motor, it would totally changes how MICA is perceived in gameplay.
