Nope apparently it is not Gaijin trying to screw DAMOCLES
Gaijin found official documentation for 50G of VT-1.
if you got the document, i’d be glad to read it. I’ve looked for it but didn’t find it
(and sry for off topic)
No, they made it 3rd gen the first time due to official documentation. This is likely just a mistake.
RDY radar got a bunch of new changes, hopefully the radar bugs are fixed.
New update to dev server?
Yes, a bunch of RDY and RDI radar changes. No medium ARH missiles got changed, so nothing new on that front.
Do we have any new radar modes? Or just changes to existing ones?
Tws all aspect?
No new radar modes, and no new actual changes now that I looked through it. They simply renamed a bunch of codes and reformatted the files. It didn’t lead to any radar bug fixes. So the changes are effectively nothing.
What happened to the report for all-aspect TWS on the RDY?
Also, did the Mirage ever have a HMD similar to that of the F-16C or was it just a sight like currently modelled?
Work on the all-aspect TWS is on hold until they can implement automatic waveform management (which is where the radar will decide what radar modes is best for you).
Yes, will be reported today.
MICA can hit it’s topspeed of Mach 4.5 like it should, all that’s left for them to do is fix the instability of the missile.
In terms of range, what is the MICA comparable to?
I heard its more in line with the AIM-120C
The range should be a bit worse than the new motor on the AIM-120C, but still maintaining better maneuverability, so the MICA EM should equal AIM-120C in overall performance.
However MICA EM should probably be better than AIM-120A in range, acceleration, and maneuverability, I’ll wait until both missiles drop in June to see how they do.
Is the automatic waveform management already being modelled in the dev server?
Not yet I think, but it seems they may be laying the ground work for it since the radar has been getting reformatted completely, lots of changes.
Ah alright, im hoping they give the Mirage its TWS PD, would be very helpful once the ARH MRAAM’s eventually get added to wt
Not so sure it is superior to AIM-120A in range, maybe… but not close to AIM-120C-5. C-5 also has high angle off-boresight launching and such… can chase down targets after tight 180° turns where MICA won’t be able to chase… I think it’s overall superior outside of a close-in dogfight.
In regards to the HMS, would it be possible to see an image or source of that? I havent actually seen a picture or layout of it.