Yes, will still get flared. Don’t need to tell me such simple things to make my argument look invalid and skill issue’d
Fine I’m just gonna keep enjoying my favorite IR missile in the game then
1 Like
Magic II should have smaller post-launch seeker FoV. And AIM-9M style IRCCM too. It’s actually underperforming by a large margin still.
8 Likes
This is true. I simply stated the way it is in the game. İt’s exact copy paste İRCCM of R-73.
The Super 530Ds on the CS-5 have gone back to fucking fuzing issues where they aren’t detonating anymore?
There was some users that put AIM-9s on their Mirages, so it could be a semi-historical option, should they choose it for balance.
While the first one is a modified Greek F1CG, the second one is an unmodified (I believe) Iraqi F1EQ.
So if they want to give any of the French Mirage F1s semi-historical less-capable Sidewinders for balance, such as the AIM-9P, P-4, or JULI, precedence is there.
1 Like
AIM-9P is is either equal or worse than Magic 1 in every way.
You don’t need to convince us with these other missiles. A lot of French mains are already in favor of removing Magic 2 from Mirage F1 in order to have its BR lowered.
7 Likes
I would definitely trade Magic II from the Mirage F1C to get it placed at the F-4E BR. That’s a decent place to be. The premium F1C 200 can get the same treatment as the TT variant. It’s a real travesty that Gaijin didn’t add the Mirage F1C around the same BR as the F-4E and Flogger. Would’ve had a great chance to shine when those were the top tier competitors.
Mirage F1CT can be the odd one out and have Magic II, as the improved RWR is a huge help for the 12.0+ environment.
7 Likes
Id love to see the similar treatment for British Phantoms with FG.1 / F-4J (UK) going down to 11.7-11.3 and FGR.2 receiving AIM-9L and keeping its current 12.0 BR.
1 Like
Hello @Gunjob
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/E3j3wqTLlMid
This report has been closed 19 days ago without any information despite it was already acknowledged, if its possible can you check it and give us an uptade please?
3 Likes
Just been closed because it’s a suggestion. Report is still open internally as normal.
Ok, thanks.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/34ICmGkJZrPJ
Incorrect HMD radar elevation on Mirage 2000-5F
11 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/5QRjLi6RMtBr
MICA EM in the modification table has artwork of AIM-120A
4 Likes
Imo they should remove magic 2 from F1C and give it just magic 1 and move it down while at the same place they could intoroduce F1 with M53 engine and magic 2. It would be more competetive and make more sense imo.
Historically can’t carry Magic 2
Why is it ladled as a suggestion when the mirage clearly needs it at the moment.
i know France has a good win rate currently but that doesn’t mean that the vehicles they have are good (not saying the mirage is bad btw its a very good plane overall and am also not saying that the leclerc is a bad tank but its not a great tank either) for exemple the Leclerc with the lack of armor protection in game regardless of all the bug reports and documents sent to the devs.
Am sure some people are starting to question if the dev are doing nothing on purpose about a simple issue that can be fixed in 2 weeks or less just by adding extra flares to an aircraft.
i am myself curious about the reason why
Also adding to the topic, why is does the MICA have the performance of the ground launched MICA VL when we are supposed to have the air launched variant that is equivalent to AIM 120 C-5 in terms of performance overall
MICA should not have issues with targets that are 15 km and above when there is reports of the MICA hitting a target at 80km +
I think the issue with the MICA at ranges is its vectoring, gaijin cant get vectoring down so it loses alot of its energy by simply wiggling in the air, kinda silly imo.