Actually, i was testing the f14 and other 4th gen that i got and when you compare the mig29’s performance to these vehicles it’s really much closer, we just think so much about the viper that sometimes we forget that other planes do exist lmao. The issue really is the busted f16.
It’s possible that the MiG-29SMT should have better performance in terms of stability and nose authority but we don’t have sufficient information on the flight control system at the moment. It’s also heavier, but I don’t know where they got the information for the weight and such so until new information is released on it that we can use in reports… it will stay the same for the most part.
it can’t keep the speed at 600+ km/h
If that is the case, and we can show the discrepancy we should be able to report it. I am not going to be available to do so until after Friday.
Ur saying that it should bleed less energy?
Yep.The aircraft is capable of maintaining a speed of 700 and above with an overload of 7g
mhmmm that’s interesting
MiG-29M :))))))
My bet is their plan is that, but instead of something like MiG-29M it’ll be Su-27 without R-77s while SMT will get R-77s alongside the West getting AMRAAMs and PL-12s coming to the J-8F
Any movement of the aircraft at a speed of 1250 km / h immediately leads to a loss of speed.Although judging by the graphs it should not
Should accelerate at;
8G from 825 until 1100 km/h
7G from 740 until 1140 km/h
6G from 650 until 1190 km/h
5G from 500 until 1275 km/h
I can test this in-game tonight, unless you want to do the report yourself?
No I don’t want to
Community Bug Reporting System there’s still mine (now that I think about it I don’t remember if I actually shared the link of it in the forum, tough all the tests were definitely shared here)
I’ll do some tests and forward my results in the comments of your report as well as forward it to some tech mods.
did Gaijin or some mods say that there would be instructor improvements for the MiG29?
No, I presume that improvements to instructor to handle aircraft in unstable configurations will be able to handle the kinematics of the MiG-29 better in post-departure situations.
do u know if the mig’s energy bleeding at slower speeds (400-500kph) rn is correct?
It is close to correct… as my report shows (in a sustained turn) at very low speed the plane is doing less deg/sec than it should be, but it’s not more than 0.5 deg/sec.
This means that energy loss is slightly more than what it should be, but it’s close enough
and the f16 is incorrect?