they dont care about them unless its a US plane, i didnt see any 3d model issues with those
1 Like
Su-27UB and Su-30M2 are trainers, they aren’t really necessary… Though a Su-27SM3 would be a good gap filler at 14.0
Yes, anything but a MiG, 25 was like a solar eclipse
1 Like
They even forgot the cms of the sm2 and just use the 30sm model
you can also easily see that the 30sm2 was an afterthought by looking at the unlockable skins it got compared to the Super hornet or 30mkm
3 Likes
Su27ub yes but we can get belarus one who better with cas at a lower br
Su30m2 is a need as it can be at 13.7 with better filght perf and more missile compare 27sm
I don’t think it’s a good idea to find excuses to under-br planes
But maybe it would be fine if they finally decompressed
Like how are the new toppers still 14.3 when they are direct upgrades of 14.3 planes lmao
yeah gaijin is going to decompress to 15.3/15.7 so that they can add 14.3 premiums
1 Like
All I want is for a MiG-29 with a modern RWR and missiles, and without that horrible refueling probe…
3 Likes
Wish they took a good look at all BRs and decompressed all ranks 5-8 to at least 18.0
I think the probe looks really cool, but I agree, I want a slim MiG-29 with fox-3s in the Russian tree.
2 Likes
mig29k
its the one
1 Like
9.31 or 9.41 ?
9.41 would be great
9.31 event or premium
Nah su30m2 is just the same capable su27sm but with better cas that it.
27sm get 8 fox 3, 30m2 get 8 fox 3 with no double rail.
Upgrade is su30m2 get better cas with 6 kh29/fab500t and better bomb such as fab 1500.
Also 30m2 get no thrust vector
Fair then
I still want the 9.15. Just something about it looks so good…
Probably the x8 missiles on the slim frame…
4 Likes
120CMs aswell
shame its still using a SPO-15 version
1 Like
I can live with that, I just want a good looking Fulcrum for the Russians.
found a source that states that r27er could be fired at 2 targets simulatenously, though it was not implemented yet on the control system of mig-29 yet.
1 Like