Can we also have MiG-29K (9-41R) or 29KUB (9-47R)? Maybe also the one prototype with thrust vectoring in the rights of being unique
Me too man, me too.
heh, better than having to differentiate bewtten the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1, did i mention the M1?
3 Likes
Don’t let that guy who adores correcting people on the difference between Su-35 and Su-35S hear that.
He’s probably lurking around here… Somewhere.
6 Likes
1 Like
Im pretty confident that Mikojan Gurewitsch himself would get an aneurysm when he would look at the MiG-29 naming schemes
1 Like
you know that Mikoyan and Gurevich are two seperate people?
5 Likes
Srsly?
yes
3 Likes
2 aneurysms then
how many cms do the 2005 mig 29m get
Tfw no MiG-29 FM fix despite there’s a MiG-29 premium
Lmao
3 Likes
9.15M and 9.61M both get 60x Single pop CM-Disp
These ones have no radar if I’m not mistaken(?)
I remember reading something like that in a polish museum where one was exposed.
1 Like
Yeah you can tell it has no radar just by the size of the radar dome compared to the single seaters
Yep that extra seat definitely takes a lot of space
No radar?
R-73?
Sounds like a goober vehicle to me. I like it.
3 Likes
If it can carry the ET, that sounds like it’d be pretty fun.
A Fulcrum with a full IR loadout.