R-73E instead 6x R-60
But lose R-27ER1 & R-27ET1
MiG-29 (9-13) from USSR, 6x R-60 replace with R-73 but remove R-27E (R-27ER & R-27ET) like MiG-29 (9-12B)
MiG-29 9-12A & 9-12B and MiG-29G airframe lighter MiG-29 9-13 (USSR)
But MiG-29G already 2x R-73E & 6x R-73E
For 4 MiG-29 from USSR, GDR, Luftwaffe & HuAF
Some early f16s are getting 13.0 tho, Idk why they are doing that
Probably, they will gets AIM-9Ms?
F-16A Block 15 ADF with AIM-9Ms would be understandable for having same BR with some old 12.7BR jets.
Could be but idk if it would make sense for them to get 9ms while early 29s will stay with the r60 loadout
It should be 0.3 higher than block 10. Thing is MiG-29G sit in a strange spot right now, since it got to 12.7 because of its loadout, despite being one of the worst of its BR
Weak plane that loses all speed in 180* turn, and with worse maneuverability than F-16, according to gaijin.
Gaijin has his own physics. And so this is the 9-47C land version of the MiG-29KUB
And what a coincidence! The gaijin special physics say all russian aircraft must fall from sky after 1 turn, and all american jets must be rockets that never lose speed!!
One engine?
İt looked like 1 to me my bad. İ thought maybe it’s variant with 1 big engine
With AESA…
İt will not change a thing. When mig-29 with AESA is added, American aircraft with AESA will also be added. (As it should be done for balance)
But the American one will not lose speed, will turn better, will have missiles with not broken drag, faster acceleration.
:)))))
I feel sad everytime I see a picture of the MiG-29
Yeah honestly with the decompressed BRs and how the Mig 29 will be 0.3br away from the F-16s, F15A, and the Gripen A. It would be ideal to give it R-73s to make it competitive. Though I wonder if removing the R27E missiles will allow it to stay at 12.7br?
Idk if limiting the R-73s to 4x would be a good idea considering its new BR placement would make it right below the F16 block 10, the F15A, and the Gripen A.
Honestly, given how insane the R-73 is at close range, a MiG-29A without the R-27E would not have the same BR as an F-16A Block 10.
To makes equal with MiG-29 with R73, they could give the AIM-9M to Block 10 as well, but if they did that they would definitely move to 12.3, the same BR as the Belgian F-16A Block 15.
In today’s update the french f16 ended up in 13.3 instead of 13.0, they prob did a mistake when making the tables. One thing that makes me sad is that probably they feel that these changes were enough for now, so they won’t touch these 4th gen for a while.
I honestly Can’t comprehend their logic when giving early vipers 13.0 Br and 12.7 for the fulcrums, like ok the mig29 sucks FM wise but everyone knows that for the META, bvr ordinance is much more relevant, even more now that multipath got nerfed. Why can’t they remove the r27er from the fulcrum and give it r73s? Why the fk they love that missile so much?
