Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection

He has a problem with Wiki boys! Lets jump him!

Hey, I explain in my own words like 85% of the time. It just gets hard to repeat.
Welcome to WT community btw.

It’s not only unproductive but also shameful, so much pride involved and insults being distributed for absolute nothing, in the end it’s just a videogame lol

That isn’t the SMT aircraft manual.

Calm down dragon! Thought we boys!

Secondly how much have we learned about these aircraft because of the controversy? Peace and quiet breeds stagnation.

This topic would be all but dead and the Mig29 would have no pending reports if Mig did not consider our debates and points and vice versa.

Additionally you must admit its been very entertaining to follow the back and forth. Stop Dragy.

100% spot on

2 Likes

I guess in some way ur correct, at least the war kinda helps to keep the thread alive lmao

1 Like

Its true, but Russian mains are fully capable to adapt. I mean Its super easy to get kills in the SMT and @MiG_23M would agree. But I honestly think its beside the point.

The model is not fully fleshed out and fine tuned. We do not even have more economy in the engines.

1 Like

Literally the best SARH in the game with a radar that can fully notch an enemy and still guide the missile to target. Kinda makes BVR pretty pointless and the addition of FOX-3s won’t fix that. MiG-29SMT will still smoke any AMRAAM slinger specifically because of this.

2 Likes

Lmao thanks ive been lurking for a while. I dont mind passionate conversation so long as it gets us somewhere. To be honest i have seen no evidence that the mig 29 could be under performing besides your descriptions of soviet doctrine. A preference for a specific attribute (i.e. supermanueverabiltiy) is not enough to assume that the mig 29 must be able to perfectly live up to the doctrine. Documentation of flight characterisitcs exists and that seems to be the best signifier of capability, thus the need for sources

2 Likes

For me - the main thing I would have liked to have seen is for the a2g capability expanded. The 16C is incredible at a2g, but the SMT doesn’t even have a targeting pod yet.

edit:
I also think they need to roll back some of the radar missile multipathing changes. The effect is so exaggerated that SARHs basically always miss below a certain altitude, and I’m not sure that’s accurate. The Skyflash is documented as being able to reliably hit targets much lower than it currently does, and I have no reason to believe the same wouldn’t apply to more advanced SARHs like the 7M and 27ER. Making SARHs more useful again would further help the SMT.

4 Likes

But why not? When the F-16C is performing up to doctrine and some.

Its living up to energy maneuverability theory and beyond currently.

I simply just want to do this when a F-16C is on my ass.
Pin on aircraft

Currently if an F-16C is on your six. He has full discretion how that fight starts and ends. He has full capability to reset the fight and come and go as he pleases. The Mig29 has no real capability to reset the dogfight except in dynamic decelerations.

You can do that right now in the F-16C

2 Likes

Would look cool, then the f16 would just go vertical and your just left there.

1 Like

No you cannot becasue if you look closely lift is immediately regained. That is post stall manuevering. There is not really any post stall maneuvering and you are fully at the instructor’s mercy.

In game you tumble and float there all stupid.

You even recently asked a dev why this is so. With no reply.

2 Likes

Yes but the ability of one aircraft to surpass its intended doctrine does not mean its opposition in warthunder can do the same.

I am not asking for a surpass in capability. But to meet that historic capability. I like the F-16C. Love it. But I understand it has a distinct advantage over the Fulcrum.

You can’t do that maneuver in any MiG-29 in the game currently. You can do it with the F-16C, although you’ll lose a little bit of altitude in the process. Neither should be doing it. You’re looking at an exaggerated maneuver that only the canard variants of the Su-27 or the TVC models can do.

Well the Mig29 as far as I know can only dynamic decelerate. Not falling leaf at 90 degrees. Could be wrong. @BBCRF might be able to shed light if its capable.

But the Mig cannot dynamically decelerate and that’s honestly all I think it needs.

I can send you the aerobatics manual with a bunch of the possible maneuvers.

2 Likes

Now we come full circle to the intstructor changes mentioned previuosly, where in order to allow such a deceleration (through high alpha) the instructor would need to change for air rb