What about the right engine? you mean in the engine in which less than 4 dozen units exist, specifically dedicated towards pre-serie testing of the aircraft before AL-51F-1 reaches the frame?
And how many su-57 does have new engines with new nozzle design?
it definitly does and im not saying that it doesnt.
But im arguing my case for the MiG-29 wich I have solid proof for.
The F14 might have underperforming thrust too, who knows.
Well, if there’s evidence, isn’t there a way to bug report it ?
Spoiler
Spoiler
there is my proof.
source is the MiG-29 aerodynamical Handbook
go do with that whatever you want
Thanks, I’re read the book a while ago with my struggling Russian xD
I don’t if I could do much about it since people seem to have reported a lot about inaccuracies but it still end up going nowhere, I’ll take a look at it nonetheless:)
too bad 29M 9.15 coming to the TT is about as unlikely as gaijin adding PTAB this update
Id buy It anyways, love the fulcrum
29M 9.15 with latest cockpit and L-150 please.
Best outcome would probably be a MiG-29 9.15 premium (MiG-29S) a MiG-29 9.15M event (29M) and a MiG-29 9.41SR Techtree (MiG-35)
(man I fucking hate russian naming schemes)
Can we also have MiG-29K (9-41R) or 29KUB (9-47R)? Maybe also the one prototype with thrust vectoring in the rights of being unique
Me too man, me too.
heh, better than having to differentiate bewtten the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1 and the M1, did i mention the M1?
Don’t let that guy who adores correcting people on the difference between Su-35 and Su-35S hear that.
He’s probably lurking around here… Somewhere.
Im pretty confident that Mikojan Gurewitsch himself would get an aneurysm when he would look at the MiG-29 naming schemes
you know that Mikoyan and Gurevich are two seperate people?
Srsly?
yes
2 aneurysms then