There are videos of possible uses of the kh38mt but they cannot be posted on the forum as they are on a sensitive topic.
Their at-speed thrust is currently correct irrelevant of your claim for engine RPM.
We know its correct because of the fuel consumption as well as the thrust aligning with documents.
What’s happening is the anti-FOD device opening does not correlate with the thrust gain accurately.
Can you send them in DM please? Thanks.
They added it? Also is it just an 12.7 mig 29 copypaste?
Looks like all the other Mig-29A’s so far, except for the radar, which as you can see in the screen it has different scan patterns, and I belive also more range.
Bruh, no R-73 or ARH missiles? I’ll pass.
What missiles does it get?
They could’ve added R-73 and make it 13.0 at least, whats the point of using modernized Mig-29 if it cant even use its famous IR missile?
Yeah that would have made it like the Mig-29G at least, it’s just a 0.3 BR difference…
Welp, i dont think its worth to buy it unless you wanna grind Italy with absolute love.
well the main thing its a financial incentive for snail to have a deeper look at the mig29 fm and get on top of outstanding bug reports - similar to when su33 was added and they finally started adjusting flanko. Ofc its still idiotic that it gets the same cringe loadout as the other 29A’s
you have missed quite important point - different radar and RWR
forgot the RWR
rn sniper is just better 9-12 in case of sensors, but at same br
tbh could see removing 27ER, giving it R-73 and 13.0. would be reasonable
ye digital rwr is a big step up for sure
same for every other 12.7 mig29