Back to the old mig29 912 and 913，
Why not have the 27er removed and add r73 to 913, while move 912 down?
For 9.13:
r27r+r73 at 12.7. Satisfying for useful r73, Satisfying for other sides for no worrying 27er
Trade performance and sensors for r73 compared to 16blk15
0.3 higher than 16blk10 for having 27r
0.3 lower than jas39a for same lvl armament worse performance and sensors
For 9.12
r27r and r60m at 12.3.
Trade performance and sensors for r27 compared to 16blk10
0.3 higher than 12.0s ofc
0.3 lower than m2kcs5 for not having flr resist
Gap between MLD and 29 can be easily fixed by fixing radar on MLD and adding historical loadouts as R-73. Instead of MLD at current BR we can have 23P.
Then there is option for really weird additions as MiG-29UB/UBM but its weird as it doesnt have radar but it have powerful IR missiles as R-73 or R-73 + R-27T/ET according to variant.
That would be nice, there’s something that i like in these late 3rd gen aircraft… perhaps a r73 mld would get 12.3 like the bison.
For the mig29s i say remove its 27ERs and keep it at 12.3 (maybe give it a 2 r73s loadout like the mirage with 2 magic 2) while adding the mig29S with ERs and r73s
I agree with you about MiG-29 but with full loadout of R-73. If this would cause an increase in BR, there is always the option to add, for example, UB as I mentioned.
That’d be excelent, our best hope for anything close to that happening would be when they add the 29M thus reviving the interest for fulcrums in the game, there are lots of variants left…
F-20 is one of my favourite plane and was hoping to recieve as tech tree vehicle but in the end Gaijin made the worst decision and made it premium vehicle.
I had to pay real money to get my hands on F-20 even tho i already had entire Us Air tree at that point.
Yeah that sucks and i understand your pain… I would unironically do the same with the mig29m because i love that plane even though i also have the entire soviet tree researched…
