Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection

[dragonflaine71]

@Sethiol

And honestly, I’m kind of done talking to a player, about russian bias, when they are a russian main to begin with.

I have top tier on both US and USSR both air and ground, but looking at your player card, i see that ur a german main that is playing mostly with tanks (you barely have planes), i’d recommend you to complain at threads regarding ground battles because this one has nothing to do with what ur seeking, it’s focused on the mig29 like the title is suggesting… Btw complaining at mods that take care of aicraft stuff won’t do shit cuz the dev teams of planes and tanks aren’t the same

[aja318]

@JEI2

Anyone know if the IRST should (or shouldn’t) have any vertical control when having the radar targets cyclic switching thing off? Since it can only be controlled horizontally

It should have vertical control but it’s a feature that is not currently implemented in game.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JUJz5axkOrod

[csla1972]

Exactly. My words.

[Wolfsbane256]

Were there any changes made to the mig29? It feels way more maneuverable then i remember it. You can even actually spin yourself out in mouse aim (in a psuedo cobra at around 40° aoa or so) , though i kinda remember being able to do that earlier… idk probably just placebo

[MiG_23M]

There were no meaningful changes this major.

[dragonflaine71]

Hey guys check this out

Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29M (9-15) - what the fulcrum would have been

poll poll poll [Screenshot 2023-12-17 at 13.00.59] Suggestion made by @EpicBlitzkrieg87, @dragonflaine71 and me. History: In late 70s, soviet engineers were seeking to modernize the MiG-29 and fix its flaws to meet operational requirements, their objective was to increase the plane’s versatility, range and improve working conditions for the pilot. Their efforts resulted in the MiG-29M product 9.15, which got its prototype making its first flight showcasing its capabilities on 25th April 1986. …

Suggestion for the MIG-29M, please consider taking a look :D

thanks @Giovanex05 and @EpicBlitzkrieg87 <3333

[Giovanex05]

Everyone here give it a +1 ;-)

[oom1992]

I wait another MiG-29 suggestion today until 5th january 2024

• MiG-29SM (9-13SM)
• MiG-29K (9-31)
• MiG-29K (9-41) Indian Navy
• MiG-29K (9-41R)
• MiG-29M (9-67)

[Miraz05]

@oom1992

MiG-29K (9-41) Indian Navy

For UK

[Mytho-GR1]

So people won’t like that

[Miraz05]

I don’t think people would dislike it. I mean players did oppose the idea of indian T-90 in UK tree but seems like nowadays they are enjoying it. So I think people might like it as well.

[oom1992]

I couldn’t answer this and don’t know might change in the future ?

But MiG-29K from Indian like MiG-29K (9-41R) for Russian Navy ?

[oom1992]

I’m surprised Omani aircraft & ground vehicle like British

[Miraz05]

They can add the indian one in UK tree and russian one in ussr

[Miraz05]

@oom1992

Omani aircraft

It’s Saudi not omani

[Mytho-GR1]

I enjoyed the T90 but Arjun would of caused less anger
Mig29k could go in the naval line as their would be a gap
And if they ever add usable aircraft carriers it would work better with ours as it can take off from ramps

[Miraz05]

USSR has a naval line? Yak141 line?

[Miraz05]

@Mytho61734

ours as it can take off from ramps

irl indian MiG 29Ks use ramps as well

[dragonflaine71]

yes

[Mytho-GR1]

I was on about the UK naval for the Indian one as their would be a massive gap between the Sea harrier Fa2 and the F35b