@MAV_GAS Are you familiar with C++?
I think it’s just the different ways of calling things in Western books.
Yes. I coded the whole graph.
I’m not sure since it’s an intellecture property of a module in DCS.
The mod is not owned by DCS, I have C++ code that I am writing. And I got stuck partly on aerodynamics and on FBW
I mean, I’m a DCS FM dev. I cannot just pull the code.
ok
is there any ED_FM_API instruction ?
Maybe better off in DMs, before someone who is salty comes by and reports us again.
no, I wanna watch
MiG-29 changes are expected next week based on the dev response to my report so I’ll touch over all of the changes since last major patch again and go over why it is the way it is. Hopefully the changes result in an improved flight model and not worsening the energy loss.
Is this your guess or was it confirmed they are going to be looked at/adjusted?
Those changes have already come… This is a bit of a late reply…?
I heard thr smt might get better engines is that true? If so how much better?
Sorry, where you readed that?
I misinterpreted the dates, apologies.
I am fuzzy on when exactly the SMT variant received improved RD-33 engines. However afaik, they were updated with better materials and manufacturing processes which while making service life and reliability better, also resulted in an increase of approximately 7% thrust.
The SMT never had better engines. That’s one of the many bs statements that someone said in the forum/reddit and spread to the whole community
Source?
RD-33MKs which I mistakenly believed the SMT received in later life updates.
No