we had some close chances for some goals tbh, the result was kinda expected when we used the backup squad against basically Frances starter
Dude, I don’t even have the performance fully maxed yet, and the FM already feels great. It’s responsive, it pulls the nose up really well, and you can feel that it recovers energy.
I’m really happy with it overall. It’s a shame it doesn’t have the R-27s, but you can’t have everything.
Now I’m just waiting to see if they give it the correct HUD for SIM, because then it’ll be a real joy to fly. Hopefully I won’t have to wait years for that.
would be a start if my report for it were to get accepeted
but nope
Could you send it here? I’d like to see it
here one for the HUD
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uQJnCtfSayeo
and another one for misisng MFD pages
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Q2dpqVL31IeJ
good thing i saw this while i was searching for something else in here
becasue this is a primary source for the HMD on the Mig-35 and will make the bug report for it much easier
i also added it to my collection of fulcrum brochures
also good to now that it is called HMTDI-KOS in english

The biggest problem is to prove that MiG-35 and MiG-35 share the avionics
truth nuke
Better to gather more evidence, because later they’ll say it’s not valid if it isn’t a russian source
It felt nice now that MiG-29 don’t have stupid energy retention when turning in Transonic, although I’m really quite surprised, it’s still lose to F-16 rather than on par lol
Wait Zhuk ae is only ±50 degrees elevation and not 60? Wonder why
Consistently inconsistent. And both photos of Zhuk are the early version with reduced amount of TRMs
i think these are from the onboard OLS stations on the 9.15D according to this video atleast
OLS-UE:

OLSK:

quality is kinda ass but yeah









