I think it was increased on land based airframes due to wing strengthening
Also 9th weapon station
Wait, I am retarded, we are talking normal take-off weight. Actually interesting situation then, because airframe should be lighter, not heavier (unless mighty AESA Zhuk is made of pure stalinium)
How to tell if sale just happened
Su-30MK2 sales competing with GTA6 pre-orders
I think the take off values are a bit off, I see they change the values between every brochure and advert I see on them.
Just MiG being consistently inconsistent
My favourite part about MiG, you can’t even be sure if 9-12 numbers are correct lmao
Thank snail that new vehicles dont receive daily rp bonuses /s
Yeah that’s wild, not prioritizing a 10 missile loadout is stupid, he took two bases and grabbed a kill on the way…
I can understand if you bomb in it when the last enemy camps his base, to grab that extra rp, but going straight for the base is tanking the team winning chance.
Usually they bring the ‘bomb’ on the useless pylon, cause ‘why not’ and then to prioritize grind they bomb first to ‘lighten’ the load and try to switch from shit position to something more useful, which is hard…
Hence why that useless pylon is the devils hand and how greed ruins them…
(unless they do full bomb load which i havent seen much)
Also can we fix this “Community Bug Reporting System” so the KH missiles would be more useful (other than to bully aa)
Base bombing in a premium Su-30 so you can base bomb in Su-30SM2
then basebombing in the femboy
When I played the premium MKK I remember other Su-30’s teamkilling in fear that they’d lose their precious base, an additional reason while I always flank left in it, to stay away from em.
Too easy for the SM2 ngl, would be even easier if it got Grom-1’s.
I was browsing the reports regarding MiG-29Kr’s R-27 (or lack of thereof) and found this page on MiG-35 from the supposedly unified family, from the website that was used to disprove the R-27 on the 9.41R
Isn’t it strange that the spec sheet only mentions RVV-AE and R-73E while the photo clearly shows an R-27
Similar page on MiG-29M/M2 indicates R-27 in the spec sheet
There is a lot of contradictions with primary sources on these planes
Wonder why they choose to accept the sources that indicate R-27 is incompatible over those that say otherwise.
At least give us a proper answer instead of ‘This is a 9.31 although the image is clearly 9.41’
30 km R-77 shots are something from science fiction
My furthest kill with an r-77 is from when I accidentally launched one at like 55km because I thought I was using an 27er on some clueless f-15 player
Nuke thunder is back, this is my call for an easy MiG-29K grind
