Danes can’t cook, smh
ovt is 9-15 with some heavier engines, its cant be lighter than 9-15
Isn’t it 1 CM per button press? At least it was on ADF when i used it
It can, IRST module was removed, probably some other parts of avionics as well.
Its actually quite smart decision if you think about it.
When you carry A2G munitions you have to get close to enemy units and sacrifice A2A missiles which MAWS and additional countermeasures comes handy while in A2A engagements you can use your long range missiles with EW suite.
Nevertheless modification can be done to pods, its just no one has done it yet.
But, F-16 already has 2 mounting points that can carry either A2G or fuel tanks, why not slap PIDS there?
If gaijin gonna give 9.15 OVT camo as an unlock or GE purchase i’m gonna strangle someone
Thats the key.
If you mount PIDS there you can’t mount additional fuel tanks which will cripple your time on air quite badly.
I believe they already considered those options and chose this route, dont think people on military didn’t think about this through.
Danes can’t cook, just make PIDS with fuel tank compatibility
Hear me out:
How about they add onboard MAWS and add additional countermeasures under fusalege like Israel did to their F-15/16’s.
This why I love Israel Aviation, they just slap tons of countermeasure to fusalege add MAW so they dont sacrifice any combat capabilities.
unrelated to the current topic at hand
but still relevant for the Mig-29
3 Likes
like, 95% of their airforce missions are ground attacks, so no wonder they will slap ungodly amount of flares onto anything.
1 Like
I mean at least it gets an HMD, unlike the F-16 OCU in the japanese tree, whixh i have to say was one of my worst F-16 experiences playing that jet.
Israel engineers be like:MOREEEE
1 Like
Belgian AM also suffers from same issue despite it has HMD like Norwegian one.
Gaijin refuses to fix it.
At least Belgian one gets 120CM like Block-50 so it doesnt have sacrifice any missile.
1 Like
Yeah that one was actually fun to fly cuz its similar to the Blk 50 but being a bit more maneuverable with less engine thrust
1 Like
no
-50kg
the new engines gives + 180kg
i see no reason to remove them
this jet is not for world ecords
then why remove the IRST
1 Like
because there is no ols29m on 9-15
its planned in 1990, but ussr dead, the first ones were made in 2005
Except this airframe already was equipped with IRST before being converted to OVT.