yes
radome geometry can also affect radar performance
this is how the R-27ER is mounted on the inner most pylon and there you barely have any space left for the flaps
if you had 4 R-27ERs the outer ones would colide with the flap
1 Like
So i was looking at this old report for the Zhuk-M being supposed to have a slewable ACM box, but later being rejected for it being a separate mode.
I would end up reporting the same mode for being missing later and having it accepted. and i noticed the Zhuk-AE brochure also describing it having an slewable mode mentioned. So the Zhuk-AE also appears to have the similar Поворотный mode.
1 Like
2 Likes
Absolutely gorgeous, a blessing to my eyes
2 Likes
feels a bit odd, they have fully accepted this source for to be used N010M on all modifications on two previous reports, and implemented one of them on the DEV server only so far so that seemed like the best place to attach it
Yeah… If that same source was already accepted for N010M data in previous reports, it makes sense that you used it again here. And if one of those changes has only been implemented on the dev server so far, using the DEV tag also seems reasonable
1 Like
i had mig-29smt hud footage somewhere let me see if i can find it
does anyone know the name of the HUD recorder seen on many fulcrums?
Denied because MiG-20SMT is not MiG-29SMT
1 Like
you are not wrong there tbh
i just found some 29KR hud pics
6 Likes
im gonna to add them to the report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gfXIBQAaG5qG
also the report was linked with the one for the MiG-35 aswell
1 Like
That’s some very good photos and HUD looks significantly better than it is currently in-game
judging by the language it is MiG-29K HUD. Unless ofc Russia didn’t bother to translate it for their KR fleet
i think its a normal 9.41 since judging by the ships superstructure it seems to match more with the INS Vikramaditya rather than the Kuznetsov
1 Like