MiG-25P Early as the event vehicle, the MiG-25P Late and MiG-25PD (with PDSG sub-variant upgrades) as TT vehicles, that sounds good to me.
aw man idk what to use to grind in sim, i love spawn hover killing f18 in sim but i also love ai ground strike with the su24m gps bomb and even the su25t i just got it.
MiG-25P late? Whats different to early variant?
Enlarged and recontoured fins, probably also newer versions of the Smerch like the Smerch-A2 or A3, as the “Early” was LRIP and so didn’t get updated with the newer versions of that radar
Think of it like how the Tiger II Nr.1-50 is to the Tiger II H
Celebrating the MiG25PD coming to the game.

We got MiG-25PD before new Fulcrum.
Incase anyone is curious or missed it.

It is coming with a single CM rail on the right wing
is it something MiG-25PD had irl? Or Gaijin pulled it out of their ass not mentioned sources?
i found this photo, looks like a CM cassete installed on that one.
and this Libyan one
it also has something that looks like SPO-15 antennas on air intakes
So, MiG-25RBs definitely were fitted with SPO-15, but those are recon bombers.
We will see what gaijin decides. I find the decision to only have it on one wing a little weird though

well, i found this thing (zero clue on how correct it actually is) and itsays that it is an optional thing
Photos of Lybian and Soviet MiG-25s that i posted show dispencers on different wings, so i guess it can have them on either one? Or even both maybe?
Both was possible
Yes, 25PD had Sapfir 25 PD radar, SPO-15 and CMs…
25P didn’t have anything of those.
I see ONLY 1 problem with this plane. What BR…
In mind with current standards it’s solid 12.0 , nothing up or down… while even there can go from god mode to crap easily.
Can’t wait to either be molested by AMRAAMs and R-27ERs or nuke 11.0 Pencils with R-40s
Seems that not every single one was outfitted with those, judging by photos. But for WT giving it the best configuration it could have would be most adequate choice. Tho it really makes you wonder why only one CM dispencer instead of 2.
I dont think it should or will be higher than the MiG-23ML/MLD
You have worse FM, worse missiles, similar radar and same RWR.
Probably right. Would kill for R-24s on MiG-25
I would say same BR as MiG-23M.
Atleast R-40RD and TD use same seeker as R-24 so should not be all that bad




