Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23 'FLOGGER' - History, Design, Performance & Dissection

says alot more than seeker there but bleh.
i also have it in russian
image

1 Like

I took it from R-24MR thread . Didnt do research of that at all.

Do you have some primary source about R-24MR?

its RM or M. there isnt really any source, very rare missile so rare its never really listed in the weaponry
there is also somethinglike: in the mid 2000,s Ukraine was selling 90 of those missiles, manufactured in 1988-1989, after they had retired their Mig-23,s. saw this somewhere

Not that it really needed to be said because I already did in the R-24RM thread, but “alot more than the seeker” is only talking about the difference between the R-23 and the R-24, not R-24R between R-24RM

1 Like

Anyone else is having a terrible time using the radar since the update?

It’s straight up not detecting targets well within range and even the ACM takes ages to lock a target if it locks at all, on perfectly clear sky.

Well MTI has half the range of normal RWS, in which you might already know this.

I’m not talking about MTI, normal mode against the sky.

feel like all radars are a littile weird now

I want MiG-23 2 variants between MiG-23M and MiG-23MLD

But, on MiG-23 group ?

No point in it. It is essentially an MLA

With much better RWR.

MLD is very good

MiG-23P still uses SPO-10 no? Feel free to correct me though

Ah yes sorry. I though you mean MiG-23MLD. My bad.

Yep MiG-23P have only SPO-10 and limited ground armament to only Kh-23M.

I mean… who is unironically gonna use MiG-23 for ground pound anyway?.. (exception being MiG-23BN and the lack of alternative/the dedication to use only DDR vehicles)

Well. I saw a lot of players which use napalm bombs on that.

MLD is does not have spo-15 but one of the other spo-15 variants idk which one it was rn

“the Mig-23 dosent have the SPO-15 but it has the SPO-15”

3 Likes

as i said i dont remember which it had but it was smh like L or LM