And that’s fine. It bumps the post.
I simply feel that countries like USSR have so much indigenous items they can have instead it’s completely unnecessary and only enshittifies the tree.
2 Likes
They’ve already said a while ago they’d get added as premiums or event vehicles and we still see them get added every so often (the leased stuff anyway). No point in bumping the posts of vehicles you don’t like because it just exposes them more.
I have no problem if they were used as an enormous part of their workforce or modified them in their own unique ways, so if the Soviets used the Komet as a mainstay of their air force I am perfectly with it. However, they didnt and captured them in small amounts. Thats not worth spreading all across the USSR tree
stfu forum
2 Likes
Probably should anyway since this is off topic.
1 Like
First definitely not and this is just a German design with new guns really (this suggestion)
Def will be on par with the komet 8.3
Better guns, I suppose more fuel and same nuclear reactor efficiency that the BI-1 has. So it should loiter a lot more unlike the komets or the Ki-200.
Can’t wait to see it TT, since I barely knew USSR made more rockets apart from the BI, so said aspect should be represented.
Including later variants of the BI.
It would be on par with me263 not Komet also btw the Komet has had its fuel nerfed to a unhistoric state for balance
1 Like
Well it follows the rules of the form so its okay in my book. A suggestion is not a addition and the Devs have there own agency.
Does the trainer have a gun?
I don’t believe so.
1 Like
that is sad
It doesn’t have an engine either
Rocket aircraft need accurate fuel consuption rates AND accurate throttle mechanics.
Bi-1 only had on and off I believe.
Me-163 had full power/takeoff, cruise (50% or 60%) and off.
Ki-200 no idea, since it was made with heavy komet inspiration, I suppose the same throttle options.
Notice how all of these aren’t the 20% sweet spot used to loiter in WT.