Its very real
Ragebait isn’t an argument, don’t bloat the comments. Forum is for helpful additions, not 70IQ keyboard smashing.
U.S. Doesn’t fly Block 70s.
The only Mutli-Missile-Rail for the F-16 was the Triple racks for the F-21, which never went anywhere.
Even if it did have issues, the 9.15 was intended to carry x8 R-77s.
Plus everything in War Thunder is always in perfect working order, that’s why we don’t have things like compressor stalls.
Its not rage bait just because you don’t like the answer
The ingame 156 was a very real prototype. Except for the HMS and countermeasures which were unfinished on the prototype and had to be based on what was planned (although they went with the wrong dispensers), otherwise a very real plane ingame
1 Like
@Balta779517-live’s favorite bug report, giving the 9.15 its 120 Cms.
(It was accepted, but will never be implimented)
1 Like
not triple racks, 3 and 7 dual racks were tested but had noticeable aerodynamic disadvantages. Same argument applies to something like TADIRCM from BAe.
“your bug report was forwarded as a suggestion” © every dented bug report mod
Both R-77 and R-77-1 use the same AKU-470 launcher. MiG-29K in Indian service uses RVV-AE operationally, which is an export R-77. If you are making such claims - provide proof.
9.15 project reached pre-production status and airframe 156 was a reference to how serial production MiG-29M would look. Gaijin only finished it with things that weren’t installed on a pre-production model, but would be installed on service ones - RWR, countermeasures (wrong ones), HMS. It is in line with every other prototype/pre-production vehicle in-game
But it’s Russian so it’s bias!
2 Likes