Thanks, I hope as well
2 Likes
It’s nice to see the ELTA, I would like to also see NATO weaponry that was projected to have like they did on the LanceR.
I don’t want to go and ask for ARH, as it would also make it difficult to use, but to have Magic 2s and some guided bombs, it wouldn’t be bad.
2 Likes
Gaijin is down bad for making this a premium, or are they?
Nahh. I’ll buy it
2 Likes
I’ll buy it instantly if it keeps the 2032 radar. Even more if it gets better weapons
I do not know what it is, but there is just something I like about it
4 Likes
I remember the good old days when gaijin said they will “never” make top tier premium, silly gaijin.
5 Likes
Given it’s a pack, there may be some preorder bonuses too. Genuinely considering it, but with the state of the Italian tree, I dunno. Would be fun to pick this one up and hopefully get a LanceR at some point as well, but I’ll likely wait for a 50% off seeing as no premium is really ever worth its full price.
1 Like
Gaijin said many things.
Gaijin please I want to buy your stuff just make it worth it for me. Make this at least somewhat unique with NATO weaponry
2 Likes
No! Because same shape of a 9.12, no proofs of NATO integration or ANY integration, so by default it can use 9.12 equipment!!1!
I hope that the guy who had contacted Aerostar will shake up this situation with some new info
todays dev server patch added more missiles combination
thats not good. high tier prem jets are cool
1 Like
My brain hurts, I don’t want to talk about those things for now
What missile did it get ??
1 Like
initial
updated
2 Likes
I think the “NATO Compatible” in this context is more to avionics and comms side rather than weaponry, just like MiG-29G, MiG-29N and MiG-29AS (Slovakia)
(granted MiG-29N was once tried to integrate AIM-9L/M but no idea was it actually employed)
4 Likes
Gaijin really be allergic to giving the MiG-29s the correct armament huh
4 Likes
Tell that to the horde of lvl 5s in F4S’ and 23ML’s. After a sale the entire BR isn’t playable until these Patrick Stars give up or learned how to use it. (Mostly give up.) You go in a match, have 90% of ur teammates die and devolve into a 1-3 vs 12-14. Newbies up top with no knowledge of how to play is a plague.
Should’ve been a Squadron Vehicle.
3 Likes
mentioned above jets are quite easy to learn how to fly and score
even if there is a newbs spam opposite team get some ez frags and silver lions
squadron vehicles dont differ from tree vehicles in getting lions and are also expensive in fly cost :/
How do you not see the issue then? You acknowledge the benefit to the latter side, yet you choose to brush off the downsides of the former.
Why can’t it be equally fun and competitive for both sides?
Expensive? They’ve lowered the cost of repairs way, way back during the ‘uprising’ or whatever you’d call it. Tech tree and Squadron vehicles aren’t money pits unless you die every match. Even then, they still base repair costs on time spent in match.
aaaaaaaaaaand they made it worse than it should’ve been
only changes from MiG-29 9.12A from German TT are:
-RWR
-Cockpit
-American bombs
-that’s it
No R73, Bugs with the MFD, Lack of splitting the MFD in 2 part in a navigational mode as it should be able to, lack of Romanian designations for armaments
10 Likes
if rocketing af module, back to base rocketing it again and dying when back to af dont cover repair cost (14-15k lions) i call it expansive and waste of time
on prem vehicles problem (waste of time and lions) dont exist even if u die few times in a match
i fly for myself, not for ‘side’
less in my team = more frags for me (and less chance of tk which is expensive)
never have situation when radar locked missile switches target to friendly?
no chance to recover lions for this on no prem machine
from my perspective adding more modern prem vehicles is good idea and i support it
if any primary sources confirms this make a bug report
(snail changed dispaly in f-35 watch to lcd cuz cool looking segment display was not correct)
1 Like