The change in the MiG-29 (9-13), the addition of MiG-29 (9-12) and according to some leaks the MiG-29M
Firstable, why increasing its BR to 13.0 while keeping F-15A/J/Baz at 12.7?
F-15s has a bigger payload, better BVR capabilities, better flight model; I do not get why moving MiG-29 (9-13) to 13.0.
The change of the payload to MiG-29 (9-13) is wrong, the change of secondary armament of the MiG-29 (9-13) was discussed with the following option:
4xR-73 & 2xR27R/T
The goal wasn’t to emulate the German MiG-29G; it was to give it the historical loadout that was planned for inclusion when it was first presented on the Dev Server.
Now, they’ve upgraded it to BR 13.0, so they need to revert the F-15A/J/Baz to 13.0 and decompress the BR from 13.0 to 14.3, because it doesn’t make sense to have the MiG-29 (9-13) with that loadout sharing a BR with aircraft like the Su-27/33, it will be a disaster for MiG-29 (9-13) pilots
In that order to keep the incoming MiG-29 (9-12) with the R-60M at 12.7, because if not you need to keep the MiG-29 (9-13) at 12.7 with 4xR-73 & 2xR-27R/T and the MiG-29 (9-12) at 12.3 with 4xR-60M & 2xR-27R/T.
Now there was a leak that the model of the MiG-29M was in progress if it is that so, you better not make it premium…
Now some forgotten stuff:
Change the tag of the MiG-27 to strikers, those aren’t fighters.
Change the tag of the S.O. 4050 Vautour IIN (Late) to the same colour of the Fighter symbol, cause it has the old colour of interceptors.
The idea is to match the colours since that yellow has been removed for several years.