Looking at it on live server. That first pic of the right cheek (as if you are in the turret) in that same spot where it shows 527 it is ~425 against Kinetic and about 344 Kinetic where you took the second pic.
So they ensured it was just a lol-pen pinata before sending it to live.
Either that or it was just a pixel spot he got with high pens.
I’ve been testing the Sabra Mk.1 is damage analysis since Dev Server #1, and nothing about the turret armor has changed besides the newly modeled armor around the breech on the gun barrel. The damage model we have now is the same one as on the dev server.
i literally said earlier i used 3bm22 and 3bm15
It’s an M60, it ain’t gonna protect against modern rounds.
A merkava however, should be able to defend itself against those.
People are saying: “It’s wAs MaDE To HanDLE hEaT ProJEcTILes!!”
Ok then, riddel me this:
Why do I get fucked by a heat round at THE FRONT and at the fucking turret cheek?
But even with all of that, the merkava should be able to protect against APFSDS.
I got pen’d by a T34 one time
I would like to discouss about the Merava armor. It’s so underwhelming and it doesn’t just make sense.
Merkava Mk3’s hull and turret are made from pure RHA - there is, no composite whatsoever. All composite armor comes in detachable modules strapped onto the hull and turret.
Thus, with armor modules on, the relative armor values are around:
front turret - 450mm against APFSDS, 700mm HEAT
upper glacis in thickest place - 420mm APFSDS, 650mm HEAT
lower glacis center - 170mm APFSDS, 250mm HEAT
lower glacis lower part - 220mm APFSDS, 350mm HEAT
Those are not particularly impressive values - on the level of T-72A - and really not great for a 60+ tonnes tank. Mk IV is better, no data, but probably + another 50/100mm of protection.
Right now Merkavas don’t have that armour to it at all.
Where did you get those pictures?
Is the previous dev server model in this photo now the same as the live?
fount them on the internet
Merkava Mk4 also misses 250mm of NERA(~425mm CE) on the sides of the hull as you can see here:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0zC0kcgHznTY
Create a bug report and provide the sources bro
Terrible modeling work… imagine being the heaviest modern tank that exists only to be designed with armor that can’t stop 3bm42.
In reality, can Russian tanks like T90M withstand small Ukrainian suicide drones? No, according to the videos. But Merkava is different, this tank has repeatedly demonstrated its high efficiency in real combat and easily resists modern threats.
The armor values of tanks such as Abrams and Merkava are fictionally placed in the game and do not have the slightest resemblance to reality.
Real life mk4 :
Front armor 880~1400 mm
Front turret 600~1030 mm
Maybe against HEAT.
HEAT 1400 mm
Kinetic 880 mm
idk what you think, but according to trigonometry 300-450mm at such angles as in the front turret are equal to at least somewhere between 1000-1500mm and knowing it has SLERA or whatever kind of MODERN composite armor, I just dont think its normal for 1980s 450mm KE penetrators to pass through ¯_(ツ)_/¯
