Meet the “Storm Warning” Major Update!

No, the HSTVL is only superior in mobility.
RDF isn’t known to be wrong. No one’s given evidence that its speed or engine are incorrect.
Wiki was upgraded. Munitions data is actually present now. While rather dangerous “accurate” statements were removed such as TWR which was a specific number that wasn’t useful in any situation.
For example, 0kph thrust doesn’t matter for almost all of the flights in-game.
Profile was changed, no downgrade.

@iMatty01
RDF’s gun depression was correct throughout the entirety of dev.
Applique armor wouldn’t matter.
Ammo penetration is correct. The higher pressure charges used for the barrel wear test aren’t the ammo that’s in-game and HSTVL doesn’t need it, especially when HSTVL already has its intended ammo.

There are correct ways to critique vehicles, and lying isn’t how you do it.
And claiming that every critic of WT are “bootlickers” just puts you on the side of defending WT from criticism.

I can only imagine what people would correctly say if your posts were begging for 2S38 to get a better APFSDS round. HSTVL and 2S38, two potent vehicles for their BRs as-is.

How is the Wiki upgraded? Almost all info is just gone! Before you could go to for example the Roland SAM and it tells you which vehicles use Rolands. That’s completly gone. It’s a downgrade in info and design

2 Likes

Ngl this update seems alil undercooked, honestly we’d rather it have been pushed back few days to get everything more polished, there’s glaring modeling errors with multiple new vehicles which is just going to annoy the playerbase.

1 Like

You would think they would fix those. What is the dev server for if not for that?

2 Likes

@Stona_WT Will this be made available in Test Flights too? Currently this is only available in battles

Ahem
Su-33 flaperons and flaps
Ahem

oh so asking for something to be fixed before being released is considered “being spoiled”?
Okay,let’s bring here my statements regarding the PzH-2000 for you and the other pal called @AlvisWisla

Spoiler


the literal hole between the breech and the barrel

Spoiler


Ammo bustle rack armor not modeled

manual reload despite the ammo rack stating it is mechanized. Plus, the reload is literally 100% more than IRL,realistically you must be drunk to reload this tank in 13 seconds

Spoiler


Lack of L15A3 and the SAPHE round and presence of the M107,despite being a round that is very VERY rarely used by this tank

Spoiler


lack of spall liners

oh don’t get me started about the Jets they’ve added, no one is even close to its IRL counterpart

6 Likes

Exactly, to underutilise a system in place to avoid these kinda issues is just frustrating to watch unfold when it’s completely avoidable.

That’s just one vehicle, the rdf lt and vbci also have modelling errors

1 Like

“Make a bug report, they will help you” 🤡

9 Likes

i’m just gonna leave this here. and this pal here is not any stranger and he’s bringing legitimate sources (as he already did in the past),so you’re either been living under a rock the past years or you refuse to leave your echo chamber

Spoiler

This text will be hidden

7 Likes

thanks for reminding me that even the VBCI-2,a modern day vehicle,lacks any form of spall liners

3 Likes

Was bout to link the same vid lmfao

2 Likes

It’s APS isn’t modelled either

1 Like

Why would you have bought those premiums, either way? I can get the BMD4 if you’re someone who missed out on the original, but the others? Stick to the Tigers pack.

He’s arguing for the sake of arguing, your best off blocking him and not waste your time, that guy would hate having having noone to argue with more than be proven wrong. Leave him to cry in silence.

2 Likes

Why release an update this unfinished so early? Why only host a 3 day dev server when you have this many additions? Why, why, why?

11 Likes

Really?i don’t have the vehicle,so the fact that the APS is not modelled either is even more absurd

watch him saying that the legitimate documents Spooks brings are complete lies

genuinely the only good thing that was released this update

1 Like

Kh31 and Kh25 missing from SU-33, for naval variants not to have Anti-ship missile

1 Like

It’s kinda hard to take you serious when you make statements like this.

The wiki went from fine to almost useless.
The profile went from fine to absolutely useless.

9 Likes