Mechanism for Handling Issues Related to China's Military Equipment

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
1

First, what is meant by a reliable source?
Army Recognition Online Defence
Mitchell Institute
If this counts as a third-party website, then what does not? These are already some of the more authoritative websites globally, long cited by various national militaries, and partially funded by certain countries’ Ministries of Defense.
What does it mean to not accept the tower perspective? On the ground, it is called a plastic model, and if the tower perspective is not accepted, doesn’t that mean you only accept the fire-control perspective from inside the cockpit? Such things cannot exist on the public internet, which means that the existing information is of no use unless it is leaked.
Regarding the flight envelope, airframe, and air-to-air missile overload issues, since they have already been implemented in the game, shouldn’t the STP files and mesh files be released to reduce controversy?For example, there were rumors some time ago about the PL-12’s varying overload capabilities at different times.
Does the suggestion section have a certain bias against China? Chinese equipment is always lagging behind equipment of the same weight and Russian equipment.

image
image1715×1019 221 KB

image
image1630×1243 359 KB

5d969ca8ab30af6ff71529232fa47d380cd20dba_2_1000x497

2

There is no “bias” or preferences “against” china nor russia in game.

You did not provide a valid sources.

3

Armyrecognition is not a source, mitchell Institute sound like a 3rd party source, you should check what qualifys as a source

Those empty pylons are infact also no evidence, and afaik are used for dumb ordinance.

Last one i cant read

4

Books, Journals, public official documentation. Websites like Army Recognition are just news media not an actual documentation blog that can be used as a primary source—but secondary sources to serve as backing.

Probably the contrary maybe selfishness that chinese content should have some sort of special treatment because every time there’s a complaint that “Chinese vehicles are not properly treated!” there will be someone “Is there a bias against China?”.

5

“com” “org”
Those have always counted as third party.
You’re demanding China be given special treatment above all other nations.

1 Like
6

Stuff like this is why those trying to report actual issues witj chinese stuff with proper sources have a hard time